Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30070607›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2018

Agent-based model illustrates the role of the microenvironment in regeneration in healthy and mdx skeletal muscle.

Kelley M Virgilio, Kyle S Martin, Shayn M Peirce, Silvia S Blemker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immuno-Modulatory Effects of Intervertebral Disc Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Coupled Mechanobiological Model of Muscle Regeneration In Cerebral Palsy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Multi-scale models of lung fibrosis.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Agent-based models of inflammation in translational systems biology: A decade later.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
  19. Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2019
    Article
  20. Data-Driven Model Validation Across Dimensions.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelley M VirgilioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-3413-2904
Kyle S MartinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.
Shayn M PeirceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.
Silvia S BlemkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive muscle-wasting disease with no effective treatment. Multiple mechanisms are thought to contribute to muscle wasting, including increased susceptibility to contraction-induced damage, chronic inflammation, fibrosis, altered satellite stem cell (SSC) dynamics, and impaired regenerative capacity. The goals of this project were to 1) develop an agent-based model of skeletal muscle that predicts the dynamic regenerative response of muscle cells, fibroblasts, SSCs, and inflammatory cells as a result of contraction-induced injury, 2) calibrate and validate the model parameters based on comparisons with published experimental measurements, and 3) use the model to investigate how changing isolated and combined factors known to be associated with DMD (e.g., altered fibroblast or SSC behaviors) influence muscle regeneration. Our predictions revealed that the percent of injured muscle that recovered 28 days after injury was dependent on the peak SSC counts following injury. In simulations with near-full cross-sectional area recovery (healthy, 4-wk mdx, 3-mo mdx), the SSC counts correlated with the extent of initial injury; however, in simulations with impaired regeneration (9-mo mdx), the peak SSC counts were suppressed relative to initial injury. The differences in SSC counts between these groups were emergent predictions dependent on altered microenvironment factors known to be associated with DMD. Multiple cell types influenced the peak number of SSCs, but no individual parameter predicted the differences in SSC counts. This finding suggests that interventions to target the microenvironment rather than SSCs directly could be an effective method for improving regeneration in impaired muscle. NEW & NOTEWORTHY A computational model predicted that satellite stem cell (SSC) counts are correlated with muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) recovery following injury. In simulations with impaired CSA recovery, SSC counts are suppressed relative to healthy muscle. The suppressed SSC counts were an emergent model prediction, because all simulations had equal initial SSC counts. Fibroblast and anti-inflammatory macrophage counts influenced SSC counts, but no single factor was able to predict the pathological differences in SSC counts that lead to impaired regeneration.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentModels, BiologicalRegenerationAnimalsFibroblastsInflammationMice, Inbred mdxMuscle, SkeletalSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleSprains and Strainsagent-based modelDuchenne muscular dystrophyskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID30070607
PMCPMC6295486
OpenAlexW2885404336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.