Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30070553›Full record

ReviewBehavioral neuroscience2018

The retrosplenial cortical role in encoding behaviorally significant cues.

David M Smith, Adam M P Miller, Lindsey C Vedder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-resolution awake mouse fMRI at 14 Tesla.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Time Cells in the Retrosplenial Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Retrosplenial cortex and aversive conditioning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Distinct Contribution of Granular and Agranular Subdivisions of the Retrosplenial Cortex to Remote Contextual Fear Memory Retrieval.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M SmithDepartment of Psychology.
Adam M P MillerDepartment of Psychology.
Lindsey C VedderDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Hippocampus, Retrosplenial Cortex and Contextual Learning and MemoryR01MH083809 · NIMH · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, DAVID M., WARDEN, MELISSA RHOADS · 2010 to 2022
$3.6M
National Institutes of HealthNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retrosplenial cortex (RSC) has recently begun to gain widespread interest because of its anatomical connectivity with other well-known memory structures, such as the hippocampus and anterior thalamus, and its role in spatial, contextual, and episodic memory. Although much of the current work on the RSC is focused on spatial cognition, there is also an extensive literature that shows that the RSC plays a critical role in a variety of conditioning tasks that have no obvious spatial component. Many of these studies suggest that the RSC is involved in identifying and encoding behaviorally significant cues, particularly those cues that predict reinforcement or the need for a behavioral response. Consistent with this idea, recent studies have shown that RSC neurons also encode cues in spatial navigation tasks. In this article, we review these findings and suggest that the encoding of cues is an important component of the RSC contribution to many forms of learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AnimalsBehaviorCerebral CortexHumansMental Processes

Identifiers

PMID30070553
PMCPMC6188816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.