SynthesisPediatric blood & cancer2018
Advancing the field of communication research in pediatric oncology: A systematic review of the literature analyzing medical dialogue.
Synthesis in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language model evaluation and feedback of transcribed simulated physician-patient verbal interactions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- The implementation and strategy of triadic communication in pediatric oncology: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- "We Were Still Left in the Back Field, Not Knowing": Pediatric Cancer Patients and Parents Describe Obstacles to Prognostic Communication.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Prognosis Communication in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Silence in Conversations About Advancing Pediatric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Communication Between Oncologists and Parents of Children With Advanced Cancer.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Advances and Challenges in European Paediatric Palliative Care.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Palliative Care Research in the U.S. and Similar Practice Settings: Report From a Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network Workshop.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Historically, communication research in pediatric oncology has relied on surveys and interviews, resulting in cross-sectional and retrospective studies constrained by selection, recognition, and recall biases. This systematic review identifies and synthesizes the published literature analyzing primary data from recorded conversations between pediatric oncologists, patients with cancer, and their families, with the following objectives: (1) to identify the extent and content of the evidence base, (2) to describe methodological strategies utilized in the analysis of recorded medical dialogue, (3) to aggregate salient findings, and (4) to generate recommendations for future prospective research related to analysis of medical dialogue in pediatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.