Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069946›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2019

Nonnavigational spatial memory performance is unaffected by hippocampal damage in monkeys.

Benjamin M Basile, Robert R Hampton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Retrosplenial and Hippocampal Synchrony during Retrieval of Old Memories in Macaques.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lesion Studies in Contemporary Neuroscience.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin M BasileSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-0738
Robert R HamptonDepartment of Psychology and Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
Neural Substrates of Reward Processing and EmotionZIAMH002887 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MURRAY, ELISABETH A · 2009 to 2025
$26.0M
Memory Monitoring and Declarative Memory: Behavior and BrainR01MH082819 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HAMPTON, ROBERT R · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002887National Science Foundation BCS-0745573National Science Foundation BCS-1632477National Science Foundation IOS-1146316NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082819NIMH NIH HHS R01M H082819NIMH NIH HHS ZIAMH002887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence that the hippocampus is critical for spatial memory in nonnavigational tests is mixed. A recent study reported that temporary hippocampal inactivation impaired spatial memory in the nonnavigational Hamilton Search Task in monkeys. However, several studies have documented no impairment on other nonnavigational spatial memory tests following permanent hippocampal lesions. It was hypothesized that transient, but not permanent, hippocampal disruption produces deficits because monkeys undergoing transient inactivation continue to try to use a hippocampal-dependent strategy, whereas monkeys with permanent lesions use a nonhippocampal-dependent strategy. We evaluated this hypothesis by testing five rhesus monkeys with hippocampal lesions and five controls on a computerized analogue of the Hamilton Search Task. On each trial, monkeys saw an array of squares on a touchscreen, each of which "hid" one reward. Retrieving a reward depleted that location and monkeys continued selecting squares until they found all rewards. The optimal strategy is to remember chosen locations and choose each square once. Unlike the inactivation study, monkeys with hippocampal damage were as accurate as controls regardless of retention interval. Critically, we found no evidence that the groups used different strategies, as measured by learning rates, spatial search biases, perseverative win-stay errors, or inter-choice distance. This discrepancy between the effect of inactivations and lesions may result from off-target effects of inactivations or as-yet-unidentified differences between the physical and computerized tasks. Combined with previous evidence that hippocampal damage impairs navigational memory in monkeys, this evidence constrains the role of the hippocampus in spatial memory as being critical for navigational tests that likely involve allocentric spatial memory but not nonnavigational tests that likely involve egocentric spatial memory.

Indexed as

AnimalsHippocampusMacaca mulattaMaleMental RecallPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionSpatial Memoryallocentricegocentricnonhuman primaterhesusself-ordered searchtemporal lobe

Identifiers

PMID30069946
PMCPMC6474245
OpenAlexW2887662895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.