ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018
Differences in non-enzymatic glycation products in human dentine and clavicle: changes with aging.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunohistological detection of pentosidine in the epiglottis:A contribution to molecular age estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Age-Related Changes in Post-Translational Modifications of Proteins from Whole Male and Female Skeletal Elements.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular age estimation based on posttranslational protein modifications in bone: why the type of bone matters.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Molecular clocks in ancient proteins: Do they reflect the age at death even after millennia?International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Age estimation based on different molecular clocks in several tissues and a multivariate approach: an explorative study.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- DNA methylation levels and telomere length in human teeth: usefulness for age estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In recent decades, several methods based on biochemical and molecular changes caused by aging have been proposed to improve the accuracy of forensic age estimation. The present study aimed to measure changes in furosine and pentosidine, two markers of non-enzymatic glycation of proteins (NEGs), in human dentine and clavicle with aging, and to identify possible differences between turnover rates in different mineralized tissues. Furosine and pentosidine were quantified in 32 dentine samples from living donors between 14 and 80 years of age, and in a second group of samples consisting of a tooth and a piece of clavicle collected from the same cadaver (15 individuals aged 18 to 85 years). Furosine concentration was much higher than pentosidine concentration in the same tissue, although they were strongly correlated in both dentine and bone. A close relationship between furosine and/or pentosidine content and chronological age was found in both tissues (r > 0.93). Moreover, age estimation was more accurate when furosine or pentosidine content was determined in dentine, with specificity values for the tests higher than 82% in all age groups. In clavicle, furosine concentration and pentosidine concentration were much lower (2.6-fold and 3.1-fold, respectively) than in dentine from the same individuals. In conclusion, although the results show strong correlations between chronological age and furosine or pentosidine concentrations determined in mineralized tissues, there is still a need for further research with larger data sets, including patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.