ArticleEJNMMI research2018
[
Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetic Modelling and Test-Retest Reproducibility for the Dopamine DMolecular imaging and biology · 2021Article
- Positron Emission Tomography After Ischemic Brain Injury: Current Challenges and Future Developments.Translational stroke research · 2020Review
- Kinfitr - an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability.EJNMMI research · 2020Article
- Huntington's Disease: A Review of the Known PET Imaging Biomarkers and Targeting Radiotracers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- D1-Dopamine Receptor Availability in First-Episode Neuroleptic Naive Psychosis Patients.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe D
methodsFifteen healthy subjects underwent two PET measurements with [
resultsAutomated target region delineation produced lower BP
conclusionsThe results suggest that the choice of ROI delineation method is not an important factor for reliability, whereas the improved results following movement correction confirm its importance in PET image analysis. Realignment is therefore especially important for measurements in patient populations such as schizophrenia or Parkinson's disease, where motion artifacts may be more prevalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.