Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069607›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2018

Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation: Strategies for the Preschooler.

Calvin T Sung, Maria A McGowan, Sharon E Jacob

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Update on Atopic Dermatitis: Diagnosis, Severity Assessment, and Treatment Selection.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Calvin T SungMedical Student III, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Maria A McGowanDepartment of Dermatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Sharon E JacobDepartment of Dermatology, Loma Linda University, 11370 Anderson Street, Suite 2600, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA. sjacob@contactderm.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe environment for the developing children is complex as they are exposed to a variety of activities and settings where potential environmental allergens may be encountered. Recent evidence supports the clinical benefit of patch testing young children suffering from recalcitrant dermatitis. While patch testing has been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration in children ages 6-18 years old, patch testing strategies for young children of preschool age (between 2 and 6 years old) have yet to be defined. RECENT

findingsAllergic contact dermatitis is underdiagnosed among pediatric patients, particularly those suffering from concomitant atopic dermatitis as the interplay between the two diseases is complex. Recent reports in literature supported the clinical value, safety, and efficacy of patch testing pediatric patients. This review provides an overview of specific pediatric allergens, special considerations, practical modifications, and systematic exposure-driven guidance approaches toward patch testing preschoolers.

Indexed as

AllergensChild, PreschoolDermatitis, Allergic ContactDermatitis, AtopicHumansPatch TestsAllergensAllergensAllergic contact dermatitisAtopic dermatitisPediatric contact dermatitis registryPediatric patch testing

Identifiers

PMID30069607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.