Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069584›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2019

Instability and impending instability in patients with vertebral metastatic disease.

Antonio Leone, Alessandro Cianfoni, Viola Zecchi, Maria Cristina Cortese, Nicolò Rumi, Cesare Colosimo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Current Overview of Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio LeoneInstitute of Radiology, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. a.leonemd@tiscali.it.
Alessandro CianfoniDepartment of Neuroradiology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
Viola ZecchiInstitute of Radiology, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Maria Cristina CorteseInstitute of Radiology, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Nicolò RumiInstitute of Radiology, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Cesare ColosimoInstitute of Radiology, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic disease commonly involves the spine with an increasing incidence due to a worldwide rise of cancer incidence and a longer survival of patients with osseous metastases. Metastases compromise the mechanical integrity of the vertebra and make it susceptible to fracture. Patients with pathological vertebral fracture often become symptomatic, with mechanical pain generally due to intervertebral instability, and may develop spinal cord compression and neurological deficits. Advances in imaging, radiotherapy, as well as in spinal surgery techniques, have allowed the evolution from conventional palliative external beam radiotherapy to modern stereotactic radiosurgery and from traditional open surgery to less-invasive, and sometimes prophylactic stabilization surgical treatments. It is therefore clear that fracture risk prediction, and maintenance or restoration of intervertebral stability, are important objectives in the management of these patients. Correlation between imaging findings and clinical manifestations is crucial, and a common knowledge base for treatment team members rather than a compartmentalized view is very important. This article reviews the literature on the imaging and clinical diagnosis of intervertebral instability and impending instability in the setting of spine metastatic disease, including the spinal instability neoplastic score, which is a reliable tool for diagnosing unstable or potentially unstable metastatic spinal lesions, and on the different elements considered for treatment.

Indexed as

HumansJoint InstabilitySpinal FracturesSpinal NeoplasmsSpineSpine imagingSpine, instabilitySpine, metastasesSpine, stabilization

Identifiers

PMID30069584
OpenAlexW2887773018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.