Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069578›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Prognostic value of posttreatment

Giacomo Maria Lima, Antonella Matti, Giulio Vara, Giulia Dondi, Nicoletta Naselli, Eugenia Maria De Crescenzo, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Anna Myriam Perrone, Pierandrea De Iaco, Cristina Nanni and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Potential prognostic role of theStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A common [18F]-FDG PET radiomic signature to predict survival in patients with HPV-induced cancers.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Role ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  17. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Role of the Metabolic Parameters ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giacomo Maria LimaNuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. giacomo.maria.lima@gmail.com.
Antonella MattiNuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulio VaraNuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia DondiOncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nicoletta NaselliRadiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Eugenia Maria De CrescenzoOncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessio Giuseppe MorgantiRadiation Oncology Centre, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna Myriam PerroneOncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pierandrea De IacoOncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cristina NanniNuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FantiNuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the prognostic value of posttreatment

methodsThis retrospective study included 82 patients affected by LACC treated with CCRT. All patients underwent

resultsKaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly significant difference in OS between the CMR and N-CMR groups (log-rank test p < 0.0001). Significant independent predictors of response to therapy were MTV (p = 0.019, odds ratio = 1.015, 95% CI = 1.002-1.028, Nagelkerke R

conclusion

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Cervical cancerChemoradiation therapyFDG PET/CTLACCPrognostic value

Identifiers

PMID30069578
PMCPMC6182406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.