Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069522›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2018

Thirty-day complication and readmission rates associated with resection of metastatic spinal tumors: a single institutional experience.

Aladine A Elsamadicy, Owoicho Adogwa, David T Lubkin, Amanda R Sergesketter, Sohrab Vatsia, Eric W Sankey, Joseph Cheng, Carlos A Bagley, Isaac O Karikari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical complications and re-operation rates in spinal metastases surgery: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of unplanned hospital readmissions up to 2-years after metastatic spine tumour surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Complications of spine surgery for metastasis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aladine A ElsamadicyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Owoicho AdogwaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
David T LubkinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Amanda R SergesketterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Sohrab VatsiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Eric W SankeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Joseph ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Carlos A BagleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas TX, USA.
Isaac O KarikariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to assess 30-day complication and unplanned readmission rates associated with resection of metastatic spinal tumors.

methodsMedical records were reviewed for 135 adults who underwent elective resection of a spinal cord tumor. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics were collected. Tumor pathology was analyzed and diagnosed by a pathologist. The primary outcomes were intra- and 30-day post-operative complication and readmission rates.

resultsOf the 135 spinal tumor resections, 30 (22.2%) cases were metastatic. The most common tumor pathology was bone (13.3%) and the most common locations were thoracic (45.2%), and cervical (32.7%). Most patients had an open surgery (96.7%), with a mean laminectomy/laminoplasty level of 1.9±1.5 and mean operative time of 328.4±658.0 min. There was a 3.3% incidence rate of intraoperative durotomies, with no spinal cord or nerve root injuries. Post-operatively, 44.8% of patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). The most common post-operative complications were weakness (20.0%), new sensory deficits (16.7%), and hypotension (13.3%). The mean length of stay was 8.8±7.6 days, with the majority of patients discharged home (96.7%). The 30-day readmission rate was 9.7%, with the most common 30-day complications being uncontrolled pain (16.7%), sensory-motor deficits (13.3%), and fever (10.0%).

conclusionsOur study suggests that weakness, sensory deficits, and uncontrolled pain are the most common complications after resection of spinal metastases, with a relatively high associated 30-day readmission rate. Further studies are necessary to corroborate our findings and identify strategies to reduce complication and readmission rates after resection of spinal metastases.

Indexed as

metastasispostoperative complicationsreadmissionSpinespine tumor

Identifiers

PMID30069522
PMCPMC6046345
OpenAlexW2809960188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.