Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069510›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2018

Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma.

Owoicho Adogwa, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Amanda R Sergesketter, Ronnie L Shammas, Sohrab Vatsia, Victoria D Vuong, Syed Khalid, Joseph Cheng, Carlos A Bagley, Isaac O Karikari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Closed-suction drainage in thoracolumbar spinal surgery-clinical routine without evidence? a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Risk-benefit analysis of wound drain usage in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with evidence summary.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Owoicho AdogwaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aladine A ElsamadicyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Amanda R SergesketterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ronnie L ShammasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Sohrab VatsiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Victoria D VuongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Syed KhalidDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joseph ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Carlos A BagleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas TX, USA.
Isaac O KarikariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical drains are commonly used after spine surgery to minimize infection and hematoma formation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of post-operative complications after spinal decompression and fusion with and without a subfascial drain.

methodsThe medical records of 139 adult (≥18 years old) spinal deformity patients undergoing elective spinal decompression and fusion at a major academic institution were reviewed. We identified 116 (83.5%) who had a post-operative drain and 23 (16.5%) who did not have a postoperative drain (No-Drain: n=23; Drain-Use: n=116). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intra- and post-operative complication rates were collected for each patient. The primary outcome investigated in this study was the rate of post-operative complications, specifically surgical site infections (SSI) and hematoma formation.

resultsPatient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both cohorts, with the body mass index (BMI) slightly higher in the Drain-Use cohort (No-Drain: 26.1 kg/m

conclusionsOur study suggests that the use of postoperative subfascial drains in patients undergoing spinal decompression with fusion may not be associated with a reduction in SSIs or hematoma formation.

Indexed as

hematomainfectionspost-operative drainssubfascial drainssurgical site infection (SSI)Thoracolumbar

Identifiers

PMID30069510
PMCPMC6046317
OpenAlexW2810287460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.