Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069353›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018

Postoperative morphine consumption and anaesthetic management of patients undergoing video-assisted or robotic-assisted lung resection: a prospective, propensity score-matched study.

Gary Duclos, Aude Charvet, Noémie Resseguier, Delphine Trousse, Xavier-Benoit D'Journo, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Pascal-Alexandre Thomas, Marc Leone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gary DuclosDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Aude CharvetDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Noémie ResseguierSupport Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Delphine TrousseDepartment of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Xavier-Benoit D'JournoDepartment of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Laurent ZieleskiewiczDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Pascal-Alexandre ThomasDepartment of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Marc LeoneDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic assistance is increasingly being used for treatment of early stage of non-small cell lung cancer. Our objectives were to compare the morphine consumption during the postoperative 48 hours after robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and that after video-assisted thoracic surgery as well as compare the patient's haemodynamic and respiratory function during the procedures.

methodsThis observational, prospective study was conducted in a single referral centre for thoracic surgery from January 2016 to March 2017. Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgical lung resection were included. A propensity score based on age, sex, American society of Anesthesiology score was used between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to determine the mean difference in the postoperative morphine consumption. We also compared the haemodynamic and respiratory function during the two procedures.

resultsAmong the 194 patients included, 105 (54%) and 89 (46%) underwent video and robotic surgery, respectively. Total 75 of each group were matched using the propensity score. The consumption of morphine was 23.0 (16.5-39.0) mg and 33.0 (19.3-46.5) mg (P=0.05) in the video and robotic groups, respectively. Linear regression revealed an average difference β (95% CI) of 6.76 mg (0.32-13.26) (P=0.04) in the morphine consumption after adjusting for the body mass index and local anaesthetic use. Robotic surgery was associated with worse haemodynamic and respiratory function than video surgery.

conclusionsAs compared with video, robotic surgery was associated with increased use of morphine and greater alteration in the haemodynamic and respiratory functions.

Indexed as

lung resectionmorphine consumptionRobotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS)video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID30069353
PMCPMC6051875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.