ReviewScanning2018
AFM and FluidFM Technologies: Recent Applications in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Review in Scanning, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image-guided embolization using Ta@Ca-Alg microspheres with optimized mechanical performance.Biomaterials science · 2025Article
- Review
- Cartilage Integrity: A Review of Mechanical and Frictional Properties and Repair Approaches in Osteoarthritis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Flagellar beating forces of human spermatozoa with different motility behaviors.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Recent advances in single-cell subcellular sampling.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Extending applications of AFM to fluidic AFM in single living cell studies.Journal of cellular physiology · 2022Review
- Cell Responsiveness to Physical Energies: Paving the Way to Decipher a Morphogenetic Code.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Modeling and Experimental Study of the Localized Electrochemical Micro Additive Manufacturing Technology Based on the FluidFM.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Photocatalytic Nanofabrication and Intracellular Raman Imaging of Living Cells with Functionalized AFM Probes.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Using Atomic Force Microscopy To Illuminate the Biophysical Properties of Microbes.ACS applied bio materials · 2020Article
- The Most Recent Advances in the Application of Nano-Structures/Nano-Materials for Single-Cell Sampling.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- Microbial adhesion and ultrastructure from the single-molecule to the single-cell levels by Atomic Force Microscopy.Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Review
- Physical energies to the rescue of damaged tissues.World journal of stem cells · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a widely used imaging technique in material sciences. After becoming a standard surface-imaging tool, AFM has been proven to be useful in addressing several biological issues such as the characterization of cell organelles, quantification of DNA-protein interactions, cell adhesion forces, and electromechanical properties of living cells. AFM technique has undergone many successful improvements since its invention, including fluidic force microscopy (FluidFM), which combines conventional AFM with microchanneled cantilevers for local liquid dispensing. This technology permitted to overcome challenges linked to single-cell analyses. Indeed, FluidFM allows isolation and injection of single cells, force-controlled patch clamping of beating cardiac cells, serial weighting of micro-objects, and single-cell extraction for molecular analyses. This work aims to review the recent studies of AFM implementation in molecular and cellular biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.