Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069192›Full record

ReviewKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2018

Del Nido cardioplegia - what is the current evidence?

Krzysztof Sanetra, Ireneusz Pawlak, Marek Cisowski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05221294 (Modified Del Nido Versus Custodiol Cardioplegia For Myocardial Protection In Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery; A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05221294 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Modified Del Nido Versus Custodiol Cardioplegia For Myocardial Protection In Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery; A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled58ConditionsCardioplegia Solution Adverse ReactionArmsModified Del Nido Versus Custodiol Cardioplegia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cardioplegia in Open Heart Surgery: Age Matters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Warm blood versus St. Thomas cardioplegia for myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Krzysztof Sanetra1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland.
Ireneusz Pawlak1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland.
Marek Cisowski1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Del Nido cardioplegia is believed to be both clinically and economically efficient. The interest in this myocardial protection method has been continuously growing. However, the evidence is not clear. The article summarizes recent reports regarding del Nido cardioplegia.

Indexed as

cardioplegiadel Nido

Identifiers

PMID30069192
PMCPMC6066678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.