Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069058›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Proteomics Unravels the Regulatory Mechanisms in Human Tears Following Acute Renouncement of Contact Lens Use: A Comparison between Hard and Soft Lenses.

Caroline Manicam, Natarajan Perumal, Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik, Yong Cajetan Ngongkole, Alexandra Tschäbunin, Marcel Sievers, Walter Lisch, Norbert Pfeiffer, Franz H Grus, Adrian Gericke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neurotrophic keratopathy: Clinical presentation and effects of cenegermin.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hydrogen Sulfide andJournal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline ManicamDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany. cmjc_82@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5891-1155
Natarajan PerumalDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Joanna Wasielica-PoslednikDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Yong Cajetan NgongkoleDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Alexandra TschäbuninDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Marcel SieversDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Walter LischDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Norbert PfeifferDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Franz H GrusDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Adrian GerickeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact lenses (CLs) provide a superior alternative to spectacles. Although beneficial, the global burden of ocular dysfunctions attributed to regular use of CLs remains a topic of much challenge in ophthalmic research owing to debilitating clinical repercussions on the ocular surface, which are often manifested as breach in tear film integrity. This study elucidated the intricate tear proteome changes attributed to the use of different CLs (hard and soft) and unravelled, for the first time, the restorative mechanisms of several protein clusters following acute renouncement of CL use employing the label-free mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics approach. The expression patterns of certain proteins clusters were specific to the use of a particular lens type and a large majority of these actively regulates cell death and survival and, modulates cellular movement on the ocular surface. Noteworthy, CL use also evoked a significant upregulation of glycolytic enzymes associated with hypoxia and corresponding cognate metabolic pathways, particularly glucose metabolism and FXR/RXR pathways. Importantly, the assessment of CL renouncement unravelled the restorative properties of several clusters of proteins involved mainly in organismal injury and abnormalities and, cellular function and maintenance. These proteins play key roles in restoring tear homeostasis and wound-healing mechanisms post-CL use-elicited injury.

Indexed as

Contact LensesHumansMass SpectrometryProteinsProteomeProteomicsTearsVision DisordersWithholding TreatmentProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID30069058
PMCPMC6070515
OpenAlexW2884902624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.