Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30069042›Full record

ArticleNature2018

Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird.

Eleanor M Caves, Patrick A Green, Matthew N Zipple, Susan Peters, Sönke Johnsen, Stephen Nowicki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What we talk about when we talk about colors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Wild hummingbirds discriminate nonspectral colors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleanor M CavesDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Patrick A GreenDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew N ZippleDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Susan PetersDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sönke JohnsenDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephen NowickiDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. snowicki@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many contexts, animals assess each other using signals that vary continuously across individuals and, on average, reflect variation in the quality of the signaller

Indexed as

AnimalsBeakCarotenoidsColorColor PerceptionFemaleFinchesImmunity, CellularMaleMating Preference, AnimalPhotic StimulationPigmentationCarotenoids

Identifiers

PMID30069042
OpenAlexW2887411036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.