Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30068616›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Exploring levels and correlates of health literacy in Arabic and Vietnamese immigrant patients with cancer and their English-speaking counterparts in Australia: a cross-sectional study protocol.

Martha Gerges, Allan Ben Smith, Ivana Durcinoska, Henry Yan, Afaf Girgis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Healthcare Professionals' Views of Working with Medical Interpreters in a Cancer Setting: an Exploratory Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  4. Enhancing equitable access to cancer information for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities to complement beliefs about cancer prognosis and treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martha GergesPsycho-Oncology Research Group, Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-7196
Allan Ben SmithPsycho-Oncology Research Group, Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-7369
Ivana DurcinoskaPsycho-Oncology Research Group, Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9568-0058
Henry YanPsycho-Oncology Research Group, Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Afaf GirgisPsycho-Oncology Research Group, Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-4006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor immigrants diagnosed with cancer, the stress of a cancer diagnosis and treatment can be amplified by unfamiliarity with the health system, lack of culturally and linguistically appropriate information, and inability to communicate efficiently and accurately with the treating team. Lower levels of health literacy may be one factor underlying poorer outcomes among immigrant patients with cancer, but there have been few studies exploring this issue to date. This study aims to investigate the levels and correlates of health literacy in two immigrant populations affected by cancer and their English-speaking counterparts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Levels and correlates of health and eHealth literacy will be evaluated using a cross-sectional self-report questionnaire. Eligible, English, Arabic and Vietnamese patients with cancer and survivors (n=50 of each language group) will be invited to complete a questionnaire in their preferred language containing the Health Literacy Questionnaire, the eHealth Literacy Scale and study-specific questions assessing potential correlates of poor health literacy, including gender, age, education level, acculturation into Australian society and number of chronic illnesses.Multivariable logistic regression will be used to identify potential approaches to support effective communication with healthcare providers and preferred methods for assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to support culturally appropriate cancer care.The outcomes of this study will be used to better meet the needs of immigrant populations, including the tailoring of interventions appropriate to different health literacy levels. Outcomes will also inform strategies for PRO assessment to inform unmet needs and to address Australian healthcare system challenges to meet the needs of immigrant populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of South Western Sydney Local Health District (approval number: HREC/16/LPOOL/650). Results from the study will aim to be published at international conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersAcculturationAdultArabsAsian PeopleAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesCultural CompetencyEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Education as Topiccancerchallengesehealth literacyhealth literacyimmigrantsunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID30068616
PMCPMC6074627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.