Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30068516›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2018

Proportion of U.S. Trends in Breast Cancer Incidence Attributable to Long-term Changes in Risk Factor Distributions.

Ruth M Pfeiffer, Yenny Webb-Vargas, William Wheeler, Mitchell H Gail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Social inequalities in survival among women with breast cancer in southeastern Brazil: a retrospective cohort study.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth M Pfeiffer *Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. pfeiffer@mail.nih.gov.
Yenny Webb-Vargas *Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-7184
William WheelerInformation Management Services, Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland.
Mitchell H GailBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3919-3263

Funding

Methods for Epidemiology StudiesZIACP010181 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBERT, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$34.8M
Methods for Epidemiology StudiesZ01CP010181 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI CHATTERJEE, NILANJAN · 2003 to 2008
$4.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMarylandMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30068516
PMCPMC8423092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.