Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30068359›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Integrated knowledge translation in population health intervention research: a case study of implementation and outcomes from a school-based project.

Jessie-Lee D McIsaac, Tarra L Penney, Kate E Storey, Lori Sigfridson, Jane Cunningham, Stefan Kuhle, Sara F L Kirk

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Capitalisation as a boundary object in intervention research, serving knowledge production and mobilisation.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Changing the culture is a marathon not a sprint.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessie-Lee D McIsaacHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. jessie-lee.mcisaac@msvu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9294-5313
Tarra L PenneyUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 111 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, United Kingdom.
Kate E StoreySchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-300 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Lori SigfridsonTri-County Regional Centre for Education, 79 Water Street, Yarmouth, NS, B5A 1L4, Canada.
Jane CunninghamWestern Zone, Nova Scotia Health Authority, 60 Vancouver Street, Yarmouth, NS, B5A 2P5, Canada.
Stefan KuhleDepartment of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Sara F L KirkHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.

Funding

Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust Cambridge International ScholarshipCanadian Cancer Society Research Institute 703878CIHR Knowledge Translation Canada: TGF 97068CIHR Population Health Intervention Research Grant FRN 127082Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada NAMedical Research Council MR/K023187/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated knowledge translation (IKT) is encouraged in population health intervention research (PHIR) to ensure the co-production of policy-relevant research, yet there is little published literature that reports its implementation and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the IKT approach used in a school-based PHIR project to understand how the research informed policy and practice and identify what influenced the IKT process.

methodsA case study approach was used to provide an in-depth description of the IKT process and understand the co-production and application of research evidence. Data were collected through document review, a survey with all elementary school principals in the school board (n = 18) following dissemination of School Reports and interviews with the IKT research team (including two researchers and three knowledge users).

resultsApproximately half of the principals reported reading their School Report (52%) and almost all of these principals attributed the partial or full adoption, or implementation, of a new practice as a result of using the information (89%). Key themes related to the IKT process emerged across the interviews, including supportive relationships, role clarity, competing priorities and the complexities of population health interventions.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that, while IKT can support policy and practice, it can be challenging to maintain engagement due to differing priorities and role ambiguity. Additional recognition, investment and research would enable better implementation of the approach, thereby bridging the gap between research, policy and practice.

Indexed as

Health Impact AssessmentHealth Services ResearchInformation DisseminationPopulation HealthSchool Health ServicesSchoolsTranslational Research, BiomedicalData CollectionHealth PolicyHumansResearch PersonnelResearch ReportSchool TeachersSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenEvaluationIntegrated knowledge translationPopulation health interventionResearch partnershipSchool healthWell-being

Identifiers

PMID30068359
PMCPMC6090620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.