Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30068323›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2018

Three-dimensional printing models in congenital heart disease education for medical students: a controlled comparative study.

Wei Su, Yunbin Xiao, Siping He, Peng Huang, Xicheng Deng

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. [Intraosseous access in infants-development of an anatomical training model].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei SuResearch Unit for Pediatrics, Xiangnan University School of Medicine, Chenzhou, 423000, China.
Yunbin XiaoHeart Center, Hunan Children's Hospital, No. 86 Ziyuan Road, Changsha, 410007, China.
Siping HeDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, 410007, China.
Peng HuangHeart Center, Hunan Children's Hospital, No. 86 Ziyuan Road, Changsha, 410007, China.
Xicheng DengHeart Center, Hunan Children's Hospital, No. 86 Ziyuan Road, Changsha, 410007, China. justindxc@gmail.com.
Hunan Children's Hospital · CNXiangnan University · CN

Funding

Education Department of Hunan Province 2016-400-744National Natural Science Foundation of China 81500041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to assess, using subjective (self-assessment) and objective (MCQ) methods, the efficacy of using heart models with ventricular septal defect lesions produced with three-dimensional printing technology in a congenital heart disease curriculum for medical students.

methodsThree computed tomography datasets of three subtypes of ventricular septal defects (perimembranous, subarterial and muscular, one for each) were obtained and processed for building into and printing out 3D models. Then a total of 63 medical students in one class were randomly allocated to two groups (32 students in the experimental, and 31 the control). The two groups participated in a seminar with or without a 3D heart model, respectively. Assessment of this curriculum was carried out using Likert-type questionnaires as well as an objective multiple choice question test assessing both knowledge acquisition, and structural conceptualization. Open-ended questions were also provided for getting advice and suggestion on 3D model utilization in CHD education.

resultsWith these 3D models, feedback shown in the questionnaires from students in experimental group was significantly more positive than their classmates in the control. And the test results also showed a significant difference in structural conceptualization in favor of the experimental group.

conclusionIt is effective to use heart models created using current 3D printing technology for congenital heart disease education. It stimulates students' interest in congenital heart disease and improves the outcomes of medical education.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart Septal Defects, VentricularHumansMaleStudents, MedicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultCongenital heart diseaseMedical educationThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID30068323
PMCPMC6090870
OpenAlexW2887741763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.