Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30068294›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Imbalance learning for the prediction of N

Zhixun Zhao, Hui Peng, Chaowang Lan, Yi Zheng, Liang Fang, Jinyan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. M6A-BiNP: predicting NRNA biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Predicting the 14-Day Hospital Readmission of Patients with Pneumonia Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhixun ZhaoAdvanced Analytics Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5544-4504
Hui PengAdvanced Analytics Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Chaowang LanAdvanced Analytics Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Yi ZhengAdvanced Analytics Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Liang FangSchool of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, China.
Jinyan LiAdvanced Analytics Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia. Jinyan.Li@uts.edu.au.
University of Technology Sydney · AUNational University of Defense Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundN

resultsWe propose to use cost-sensitive learning ideas to resolve the imbalance data issues in the human mRNA m

conclusionThe proposed cost-sensitive model and the new features are useful in human mRNA m

Indexed as

AdenosineAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningRNA, MessengerAdenosineN-methyladenosineRNA, MessengerImbalance LearningN6-methyladenosineSite Prediction

Identifiers

PMID30068294
PMCPMC6090857
OpenAlexW2886857295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.