Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30068254›Full record

Observational studyLupus2018

Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with long-term corticosteroid exposure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

S Kabadi, J Yeaw, A K Bacani, E Tafesse, K Bos, S Karkare, M DeKoven, E R Vina

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lupus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S Kabadi1 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
J Yeaw2 IQVIA, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
A K Bacani1 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
E Tafesse1 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
K Bos1 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
S Karkare2 IQVIA, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
M DeKoven2 IQVIA, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
E R Vina3 University of Arizona Arthritis Center, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USIQVIA (United States) · USBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · US

Funding

Quality and Equity in Osteoarthritis: Understanding & Improving Treatment UseK23AR067226 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI VINA, ERNEST R · 2015 to 2019
$834k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR067226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the association between exposure to oral corticosteroids and future healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods Adults diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (index date) between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2013 and naive to oral corticosteroids with continuous health plan enrollment for ≥6 months pre- and ≥5 years post-index were identified from a large health plan claims database. Per-patient monthly average daily dose of oral corticosteroids (prednisone or its equivalent) was calculated for the first 2 years post-index to categorize patients into four steroid exposure cohorts: low (≤5 mg/day), medium (6-20 mg/day), high (>20 mg/day) and no steroids. Differences in healthcare resource utilization and total healthcare costs during the third year post-index across corticosteroid exposure cohorts were modeled with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Results The study included 18,618 systemic lupus erythematosus patients (163 high dose, 1127 medium dose, 6717 low dose and 10,611 no steroids). Compared to low-dose corticosteroid users, high-dose corticosteroid users were more likely to have emergency room visits (39.3% vs. 29.7%; p = 0.0085) and to be hospitalized (21.5% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.0005). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, they also had significantly greater average annual total healthcare costs (US$60,366 vs. US$18,777; p < 0.0001). A 1 mg increase in corticosteroid average daily dose was associated with 1.07 times the average annual costs after adjusting for baseline characteristics ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion Long-term high-dose oral corticosteroid use was associated with significantly greater future healthcare resource utilization and costs. Judicious reduction in daily steroid dose may decrease the imminent economic burden associated with high-dose steroid use in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ResourcesHumansLongitudinal StudiesLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultAdrenal Cortex HormonesburdencorticosteroidscostsLupusresource utilizationsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID30068254
PMCPMC6264911
OpenAlexW2885717820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.