Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30067866›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Social adjustment in adolescent survivors of pediatric central nervous system tumors: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Fiona Schulte, Tara M Brinkman, Chenghong Li, Taryn Fay-McClymont, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Kirsten K Ness, Rebecca M Howell, Sabine Mueller, Elizabeth Wells, Douglas Strother and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fiona SchulteUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3076-9676
Tara M BrinkmanSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Chenghong LiSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Taryn Fay-McClymontUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Deo Kumar SrivastavaSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Kirsten K NessSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Rebecca M HowellThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sabine MuellerUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Elizabeth WellsChildren's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Douglas StrotherUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lucie Lafay-CousinUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Wendy LeisenringFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Leslie L RobisonSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Gregory T ArmstrongSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Kevin R KrullSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI SUZANNE J. BAKER · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVOR STUDYU01CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ROBISON, LESLIE L · 1993 to 1999
–
American Lebanese Syrian Associated CharitiesCancer Center Support (CORE) CA21765NCI NIH HHS CA55727NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and predictors of social difficulties in adolescent survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors.

methodsSix hundred sixty-five survivors of CNS tumors (53.8% male and 51.7% treated with cranial radiation therapy [CRT]), who had a current median age of 15.0 years (range, 2.0-17.0 years) and were a median of 12.1 years (range, 8.0-17.7 years) from their diagnosis, were compared with 1376 survivors of solid tumors (50.4% male), who had a median age of 15.0 years (range, 12.0-17.0 years) and were a median of 13.2 years (range, 8.3-17.9 years) from their diagnosis, and 726 siblings (52.2% male), who had a median age of 15.0 years (range, 12.0-17.0 years). Social adjustment was measured with parent-proxy responses to the Behavior Problems Index. Latent profile analysis defined social classes. Multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, and age at diagnosis, identified predictors of class membership. Path analyses tested mediating effects of physical limitations, sensory loss, and cognitive impairment on social outcomes.

resultsCaregivers reported that survivors of CNS tumors were more likely to have 0 friends (15.3%) and to interact with friends less than once per week (41.0%) in comparison with survivors of solid tumors (2.9% and 13.6%, respectively) and siblings (2.3% and 8.7%, respectively). Latent profile analysis identified 3 social classes for survivors of CNS tumors: well-adjusted (53.4%), social deficits (16.2%), and poor peer relationships (30.4%). However, 2 classes were identified for survivors of solid tumors and siblings: well-adjusted (86.2% and 91.1%, respectively) and social deficits (13.8% and 8.9%, respectively). CRT predicted class membership for CNS survivors (odds ratio [OR] for poor peer relationships, 1.16/10 Gy; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.25; OR for social deficits 1.14/10 Gy; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; reference, well-adjusted). Cognitive impairment mediated the association between all social outcomes and CRT (P values < .001).

conclusionAlmost 50% of survivors of CNS tumors experience social difficulties; the pattern is unique in comparison with solid tumor and sibling groups. Cognitive impairment is associated with increased risk, and this highlights the need for multitargeted interventions.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSocial AdjustmentAdolescentAge of OnsetCancer SurvivorsCase-Control StudiesCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildCranial IrradiationFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleNeuroblastomaRisk FactorsSiblingsadolescentbrain neoplasmscognitionsocial adjustmentsurvivors

Identifiers

PMID30067866
PMCPMC6191352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.