Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30067862›Full record

ArticleEcology2018

Disentangling nutritional pathways linking leafcutter ants and their co-evolved fungal symbionts using stable isotopes.

Jonathan Z Shik, Winnie Rytter, Xavier Arnan, Anders Michelsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mutualism and division of labour: a mutual expansion of concepts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Dietary potential of the symbiotic fungusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Production ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jonathan Z ShikCentre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Winnie RytterCentre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Xavier ArnanCREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, ES-08193, Catalunya, Spain.
Anders MichelsenTerrestrial Ecology Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCentre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ES

Funding

Centre for Social Evolution at the University of CopenhagenPostdoctoral Fellowship from a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship 327940 INSEAMERamón y Cajal research contract by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RYC-2015-18448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leafcutter ants are the ultimate insect superorganisms, with up to millions of physiologically specialized workers cooperating to cut and transport vegetation and then convert it into compost used to cultivate co-evolved fungi, domesticated over millions of years. We tested hypotheses about the nutrient-processing dynamics governing this functional integration, tracing

Indexed as

AntsAnimalsArgentinaFungiIsotopesSymbiosisIsotopes13C15Nattine antscarbon and nitrogen isotopesnutritional ecologytropical rainforest

Identifiers

PMID30067862
PMCPMC6174977
OpenAlexW2885117766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.