Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30067845›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evaluation of genetic diversity among Russet potato clones and varieties from breeding programs across the United States.

Sapinder Bali, Girijesh Patel, Rich Novy, Kelly Vining, Chuck Brown, David Holm, Gregory Porter, Jeffrey Endelman, Asunta Thompson, Vidyasagar Sathuvalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genotype-by-environment interactions and local adaptation shape selection in the US National Chip Processing Trial.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-wide association study identifies various loci underlying agronomic and morphological traits in diversified potato panel.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sapinder BaliHermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Hermiston, Oregon, United States of America.
Girijesh PatelDepartment of Oncological Studies, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Rich NovyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Aberdeen, Idaho, United States of America.
Kelly ViningDepartment of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1513-731X
Chuck BrownUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Prosser, Washington, United States of America.
David HolmDepartment of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, San Luis Valley Research Center, Colorado State University, San Luis, Colorado, United States of America.
Gregory PorterSchool of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Jeffrey EndelmanDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Asunta ThompsonDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States of America.
Vidyasagar SathuvalliHermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Hermiston, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5727-9987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA fingerprinting is a powerful tool for plant diversity studies, cultivar identification, and germplasm conservation and management. In breeding programs, fingerprinting and diversity analysis provide an insight into the extent of genetic variability available in the breeding material, which in turn helps breeders to maintain a pool of highly diverse genotypes by avoiding the selection of closely related parents. Oblong-long tubers with russeting skin characterize Russet potato, a primary potato market class in the United States, and especially in the western production regions. The aim of this study was to estimate the level of genetic diversity within this market class potato, utilizing clones and varieties from various breeding programs across the United States. A collection of 264 Russet and non-Russet breeding clones and varieties was fingerprinted using 23 highly polymorphic genome-wide simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, resulting in 142 polymorphic alleles. The number of alleles produced per SSR varied from 2 to 10, with an average of 6.2 alleles per marker. The polymorphic information content and expected heterozygosity of SSRs ranged from 0.37 to 0.89 and 0.50 to 0.89 with an average of 0.77 and 0.81, respectively. Out of these 23 markers, we propose nine SSR markers best suited for fingerprinting Russet potatoes based on polymorphic information content, heterozygosity and ease of scoring. Diversity analysis of these clones suggest that there is significant diversity across the breeding material and the diversity has been evenly distributed among all the regional breeding programs.

Indexed as

AllelesDNA FingerprintingDNA, PlantGenetic VariationGenotypeHeterozygoteMicrosatellite RepeatsPlant BreedingPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASolanum tuberosumUnited StatesDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID30067845
PMCPMC6070254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.