ArticlePloS one2018
Comparative transcriptomics reveals specific responding genes associated with atherosclerosis in rabbit and mouse models.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-rodent Models of Atherosclerosis: Repurposing of Existing Drugs and Search for Novel Treatment Strategies.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- A single workflow for multi-species blood transcriptomics.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Distinct Retrotransposon Evolution Profile in the Genome of Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mouse and rabbit are frequently employed species for atherosclerosis research. With respect to modeling human atherosclerosis, it has been observed that variations in phenotype under commonly used atherogenic conditions are partial or no congruence between two species. However, genome-wide molecular variations are still lacking. To understand the differences between rabbit and mouse in developing atherosclerosis, here from aspect of orthologs, we compared the genome-wide expression profiles of two species under the same atherosclerosis driven factors: high-fat diet or LDLR deficiency. Our results illuminated that: 1) LDLR-deficiency induced different gene expression changes in rabbit and mouse. WHHL rabbit had more significantly differential expressed genes and the most of genes were down-regulated. 2) Some genes and functions were commonly dysregulated in high-fat fed rabbit and mouse models, such as lipid metabolism and inflammation process. However, high-fat intake in rabbit produced more differentially expressed genes and more serious functional effects. 3) Specific differential expression genes were revealed for rabbit and mouse related with high-fat intake. In the aspect of lipoprotein metabolism, APOA4 and APOB was the major responding gene in rabbit and mice, respectively. The expression change of APOA4 and APOB in human atherosclerosis was more similar to rabbit, and therefore rabbit might be a better animal model for investigating human lipoprotein metabolism related diseases. In conclusion, our comparative transcriptome analysis revealed species-specific expression regulation that could partially explain the different phenotypes between rabbit and mouse, which was helpful for model selection to study atherosclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.