ArticlePloS one2018
Deciphering the targets of retroviral protease inhibitors in Plasmodium berghei.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Malaria-Selective Proteasome β5 Inhibitors Through Pharmacophore Modeling, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Inhibition ofCurrent research in structural biology · 2024Article
- Artemisinin Binds and Inhibits the Activity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Repurposing Drugs to Fight Hepatic Malaria Parasites.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Malaria parasite plasmepsins: More than just plain old degradative pepsins.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Review
- Nelfinavir Inhibits the TCF11/Nrf1-Mediated Proteasome Recovery Pathway in Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2020Article
- The Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Malaria Parasite Transmission.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Retroviral protease inhibitors (RPIs) such as lopinavir (LP) and saquinavir (SQ) are active against Plasmodium parasites. However, the exact molecular target(s) for these RPIs in the Plasmodium parasites remains poorly understood. We hypothesised that LP and SQ suppress parasite growth through inhibition of aspartyl proteases. Using reverse genetics approach, we embarked on separately generating knockout (KO) parasite lines lacking Plasmepsin 4 (PM4), PM7, PM8, or DNA damage-inducible protein 1 (Ddi1) in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei ANKA. We then tested the suppressive profiles of the LP/Ritonavir (LP/RT) and SQ/RT as well as antimalarials; Amodiaquine (AQ) and Piperaquine (PQ) against the KO parasites in the standard 4-day suppressive test. The Ddi1 gene proved refractory to deletion suggesting that the gene is essential for the growth of the asexual blood stage parasites. Our results revealed that deletion of PM4 significantly reduces normal parasite growth rate phenotype (P = 0.003). Unlike PM4_KO parasites which were less susceptible to LP and SQ (P = 0.036, P = 0.030), the suppressive profiles for PM7_KO and PM8_KO parasites were comparable to those for the WT parasites. This finding suggests a potential role of PM4 in the LP and SQ action. On further analysis, modelling and molecular docking studies revealed that both LP and SQ displayed high binding affinities (-6.3 kcal/mol to -10.3 kcal/mol) towards the Plasmodium aspartyl proteases. We concluded that PM4 plays a vital role in assuring asexual stage parasite fitness and might be mediating LP and SQ action. The essential nature of the Ddi1 gene warrants further studies to evaluate its role in the parasite asexual blood stage growth as well as a possible target for the RPIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.