Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30067553›Full record

Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine

The Effect of Positive and Negative Affect on Early Treatment Milestones in the Context of Integrated Smoking Treatment.

Lorra Garey, Brooke Y Kauffman, Kara F Manning, Samar A Taha, Norman B Schmidt, Clayton Neighbors, Michael J Zvolensky

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Differences in Cognitive Task Performance, Reinforcement Enhancement, and Nicotine Dependence Between Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarette Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorra GareyDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX (LG, BYK, KFM, SAT, CN, MJZ); Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL (NBS); Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (MJZ).
Brooke Y Kauffman
Kara F Manning
Samar A Taha
Norman B Schmidt
Clayton Neighbors
Michael J Zvolensky

Funding

Smoking-Based Prevention Program for Panic DisorderR01MH076629 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI FOREHAND, REX · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Personalized Feedback for Distress Intolerant SmokersF31DA046127 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI REDMOND, BROOKE Y · 2018 to 2020
$107k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA046127NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Efforts have been made to develop effective, integrated smoking-cessation treatments for individuals with greater difficulty quitting, including individuals with elevated anxiety sensitivity (AS). Despite initial evidence for the efficacy of these treatments, little is understood about pretreatment predictors of early treatment milestones, including treatment initiation and response. Positive affectivity (PA) and negative affectivity (NA) are unique mood traits that may be related to early treatment milestones. Indeed, PA and NA are related to smoking and mood outcomes generally. Yet, it is presently unknown if pretreatment PA or NA predict early treatment milestones within the context of an integrated smoking-cessation treatment. The current study sought to evaluate the independent effect of PA and NA on early treatment milestones within the context of an integrated smoking-AS treatment protocol. Smoking and AS outcomes were evaluated independently. Participants included 288 (50% female; Mage = 38.66, SD = 13.67) treatment-seeking adult daily cigarette users. Results indicated that higher pretreatment NA was associated with an increased likelihood of early dropout versus responding to treatment across both outcomes (smoking: odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.99; AS: OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.98). Pretreatment PA did not significantly differentiate any of the groups. Overall, the present study serves as an initial investigation of the role of pretreatment NA in identifying those at greatest risk for dropping out of treatment (cf. responding to treatment).

Indexed as

AdultAffectCigarette SmokingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DropoutsPersonalitySmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID30067553
PMCPMC6349496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.