Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30067449›Full record

ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2018

Plant peptides in plant defense responses.

Z Hu, H Zhang, K Shi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Long-Term Phytaspase Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influences ofCurrent protein & peptide science · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Peptidome: Chaos or Inevitability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Z Hua Department of Horticulture , Zhejiang University , Hangzhou , P.R. China.
H Zhanga Department of Horticulture , Zhejiang University , Hangzhou , P.R. China.
K Shia Department of Horticulture , Zhejiang University , Hangzhou , P.R. China.
Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant peptides secreted as signal molecular to trigger cell-to-cell signaling are indispensable for plant growth and defense processes. Preciously, it is regraded some plant peptides function in plant growth and development, whereas others regulate defense response in plant-microbe interactions. However, this prejudice is got rid due to more and more evidence showed growth-related plant peptides also exhibit bifunctional roles in plant defense response against different microbial pathogens. Here we provide a mini-review of reported types of plant peptides, including their basic information, reported receptor ligands, and especially direct or indirect roles in plant immune responses.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantPeptidesPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsSignal TransductionPeptidesPlant Proteinscysteine-rich peptidesmicrobial pathogenspeptide receptorplant defense responsesplant peptidesmall posttranslationally modified peptides

Identifiers

PMID30067449
PMCPMC6149413
OpenAlexW2887308419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.