Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30067182›Full record

Observational studyCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2018

Practice and attitudes regarding double gloving among staff surgeons and surgical trainees.

Mark E Lipson, Rob Deardon, Noah J Switzer, Chris de Gara, Chad G Ball, Sean C Grondin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knot tying in arthroplasty and arthroscopy causes lesions to surgical gloves: a potential risk of infection.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark E LipsonFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Lipson, Ball, Grondin); the Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Deardon); and the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Switzer, de Gara).
Rob DeardonFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Lipson, Ball, Grondin); the Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Deardon); and the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Switzer, de Gara).
Noah J SwitzerFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Lipson, Ball, Grondin); the Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Deardon); and the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Switzer, de Gara).
Chris de GaraFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Lipson, Ball, Grondin); the Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Deardon); and the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Switzer, de Gara).
Chad G BallFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Lipson, Ball, Grondin); the Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Deardon); and the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Switzer, de Gara).
Sean C GrondinFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Lipson, Ball, Grondin); the Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Deardon); and the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Switzer, de Gara).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite supporting evidence, many staff surgeons and surgical trainees do not routinely double glove. We performed a study to assess rates of and attitudes toward double gloving and the use of eye protection in the operating room.

methodsWe conducted an electronic survey among all staff surgeons and surgical trainees at 2 tertiary care centres in Alberta between September and November 2015.We analyzed the data using log-binomial regression for binary outcomes to account for multiple independent variables and interactions. For 2-group comparisons, we used a 2-group test of proportions.

resultsThe response rate was 34.3% (361/1051); 205/698 staff surgeons (29.4%) and 156/353 surgical trainees (44.2%) responded. Trainees were more likely than staff surgeons to ever double glove in the operating room (

conclusionRates of double gloving leave room for improvement. Surgical trainees were more likely than staff surgeons to double glove. Barriers remain to routine double gloving among staff surgeons and trainees. Increased education on the benefits of double gloving and early introduction of this practice may increase uptake.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGloves, SurgicalPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalMaleMiddle AgedNeedlestick InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30067182
PMCPMC6066380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.