Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066753›Full record

ReviewMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2018

What are the advantages of living in a community? A microbial biofilm perspective!

André Luis Souza Dos Santos, Anna Clara Milesi Galdino, Thaís Pereira de Mello, Lívia de Souza Ramos, Marta Helena Branquinha, Ana Maria Bolognese, José Columbano Neto, Maryam Roudbary

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Old drugs, new weapons: current trends in repurposing therapies against antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Among Isolates ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The multidrug-resistantCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Niosome-loaded Tet-Amp against S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

André Luis Souza Dos Santos
Anna Clara Milesi GaldinoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Laboratório de Estudos Avançados em Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Thaís Pereira de MelloUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Laboratório de Estudos Avançados em Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Lívia de Souza RamosUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Laboratório de Estudos Avançados em Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Marta Helena BranquinhaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Laboratório de Estudos Avançados em Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Ana Maria BologneseUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Odontopediatria e Ortodontia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
José Columbano NetoFaculdades São José, Faculdade de Odontologia, Disciplina de Ortodontia e Clínica Integrada Infantil, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Maryam RoudbaryIran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Mycology and Parasitology, Tehran, Iran.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRFaculdade Ceres · BRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation is the preferred mode of growth lifestyle for many microorganisms, including bacterial and fungal human pathogens. Biofilm is a strong and dynamic structure that confers a broad range of advantages to its members, such as adhesion/cohesion capabilities, mechanical properties, nutritional sources, metabolite exchange platform, cellular communication, protection and resistance to drugs (e.g., antimicrobials, antiseptics, and disinfectants), environmental stresses (e.g., dehydration and ultraviolet light), host immune attacks (e.g., antibodies, complement system, antimicrobial peptides, and phagocytes), and shear forces. Microbial biofilms cause problems in the hospital environment, generating high healthcare costs and prolonged patient stay, which can result in further secondary microbial infections and various health complications. Consequently, both public and private investments must be made to ensure better patient management, as well as to find novel therapeutic strategies to circumvent the resistance and resilience profiles arising from biofilm-associated microbial infections. In this work, we present a general overview of microbial biofilm formation and its relevance within the biomedical context.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiofilmsEnvironmental MicrobiologyFungiHumans

Identifiers

PMID30066753
PMCPMC6057313
OpenAlexW2883480974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.