ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018
Extracting psychiatric stressors for suicide from social media using deep learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in suicide prevention: promise, peril, and clinical implications for clinical practice.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2027Review
- Identifying suicide-related language in smartphone keyboard entries among high-risk adolescents.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating model generalizability for suicide attempt risk prediction: traditional machine vs deep learning.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Smartphone-based text obtained via passive sensing as it relates to direct suicide risk assessment.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding social media discourse on antidepressants: unsupervised and sentiment analysis using X.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Article
- Explainable AI-based suicidal and non-suicidal ideations detection from social media text with enhanced ensemble technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Large language models for disease diagnosis: a scoping review.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Automated detection and prediction of suicidal behavior from clinical notes using deep learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting state level suicide fatalities in the united states with realtime data and machine learning.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
- Discerning conversational context in online health communities for personalized digital behavior change solutions using Pragmatics to Reveal Intent in Social Media (PRISM) framework.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Transfer learning for non-image data in clinical research: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- Automatic detection of depression symptoms in twitter using multimodal analysis.The Journal of supercomputing · 2022Article
- Extracting postmarketing adverse events from safety reports in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) using deep learning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Information and Communication Technology Use in Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Suicide-related Twitter Content in Response to a National Mental Health Awareness Campaign and the Association between the Campaign and Suicide Rates in Ontario.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2021Article
- Machine Learning for Mental Health in Social Media: Bibliometric Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Know Yourself: Physical and Psychological Self-Awareness With Lifelog.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicide has been one of the leading causes of deaths in the United States. One major cause of suicide is psychiatric stressors. The detection of psychiatric stressors in an at risk population will facilitate the early prevention of suicidal behaviors and suicide. In recent years, the widespread popularity and real-time information sharing flow of social media allow potential early intervention in a large-scale population. However, few automated approaches have been proposed to extract psychiatric stressors from Twitter. The goal of this study was to investigate techniques for recognizing suicide related psychiatric stressors from Twitter using deep learning based methods and transfer learning strategy which leverages an existing annotation dataset from clinical text.
methodsFirst, a dataset of suicide-related tweets was collected from Twitter streaming data with a multiple-step pipeline including keyword-based retrieving, filtering and further refining using an automated binary classifier. Specifically, a convolutional neural networks (CNN) based algorithm was used to build the binary classifier. Next, psychiatric stressors were annotated in the suicide-related tweets. The stressor recognition problem is conceptualized as a typical named entity recognition (NER) task and tackled using recurrent neural networks (RNN) based methods. Moreover, to reduce the annotation cost and improve the performance, transfer learning strategy was adopted by leveraging existing annotation from clinical text. RESULTS &
conclusionsTo our best knowledge, this is the first effort to extract psychiatric stressors from Twitter data using deep learning based approaches. Comparison to traditional machine learning algorithms shows the superiority of deep learning based approaches. CNN is leading the performance at identifying suicide-related tweets with a precision of 78% and an F-1 measure of 83%, outperforming Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extra Trees (ET), etc. RNN based psychiatric stressors recognition obtains the best F-1 measure of 53.25% by exact match and 67.94% by inexact match, outperforming Conditional Random Fields (CRF). Moreover, transfer learning from clinical notes for the Twitter corpus outperforms the training with Twitter corpus only with an F-1 measure of 54.9% by exact match. The results indicate the advantages of deep learning based methods for the automated stressors recognition from social media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.