Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066665›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

Extracting psychiatric stressors for suicide from social media using deep learning.

Jingcheng Du, Yaoyun Zhang, Jianhong Luo, Yuxi Jia, Qiang Wei, Cui Tao, Hua Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding social media discourse on antidepressants: unsupervised and sentiment analysis using X.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingcheng DuThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Yaoyun ZhangThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jianhong LuoThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Yuxi JiaThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Qiang WeiThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Cui TaoThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Hua XuThe University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. hua.xu@uth.tmc.edu.
Jilin Medical University · CNZhejiang Sci-Tech University · CN

Funding

Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Real-time Disambiguation of Abbreviations in Clinical NotesR01LM010681 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI XU, HUA · 2010 to 2017
$3.1M
Patient Medical History Representation, Extraction, and Inference from EHR DataR01LM011829 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
caCDE-QA: A Quality Assurance Platform for Cancer Study Common Data ElementsU01CA180940 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA180940NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010681NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide has been one of the leading causes of deaths in the United States. One major cause of suicide is psychiatric stressors. The detection of psychiatric stressors in an at risk population will facilitate the early prevention of suicidal behaviors and suicide. In recent years, the widespread popularity and real-time information sharing flow of social media allow potential early intervention in a large-scale population. However, few automated approaches have been proposed to extract psychiatric stressors from Twitter. The goal of this study was to investigate techniques for recognizing suicide related psychiatric stressors from Twitter using deep learning based methods and transfer learning strategy which leverages an existing annotation dataset from clinical text.

methodsFirst, a dataset of suicide-related tweets was collected from Twitter streaming data with a multiple-step pipeline including keyword-based retrieving, filtering and further refining using an automated binary classifier. Specifically, a convolutional neural networks (CNN) based algorithm was used to build the binary classifier. Next, psychiatric stressors were annotated in the suicide-related tweets. The stressor recognition problem is conceptualized as a typical named entity recognition (NER) task and tackled using recurrent neural networks (RNN) based methods. Moreover, to reduce the annotation cost and improve the performance, transfer learning strategy was adopted by leveraging existing annotation from clinical text. RESULTS &

conclusionsTo our best knowledge, this is the first effort to extract psychiatric stressors from Twitter data using deep learning based approaches. Comparison to traditional machine learning algorithms shows the superiority of deep learning based approaches. CNN is leading the performance at identifying suicide-related tweets with a precision of 78% and an F-1 measure of 83%, outperforming Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extra Trees (ET), etc. RNN based psychiatric stressors recognition obtains the best F-1 measure of 53.25% by exact match and 67.94% by inexact match, outperforming Conditional Random Fields (CRF). Moreover, transfer learning from clinical notes for the Twitter corpus outperforms the training with Twitter corpus only with an F-1 measure of 54.9% by exact match. The results indicate the advantages of deep learning based methods for the automated stressors recognition from social media.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSocial MediaStress, PsychologicalSuicide PreventionAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDeep learningMental healthNamed entity recognitionPsychiatric stressorsSocial mediaSuicide

Identifiers

PMID30066665
PMCPMC6069295
OpenAlexW2883944442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.