Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066650›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

INBIA: a boosting methodology for proteomic network inference.

Davide S Sardina, Giovanni Micale, Alfredo Ferro, Alfredo Pulvirenti, Rosalba Giugno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Davide S SardinaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie 15, Verona, 37134, Italy.
Giovanni MicaleDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Alfredo FerroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, c/o Dept. of Math. and Comp. Science, Viale A. Doria 6, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Alfredo PulvirentiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, c/o Dept. of Math. and Comp. Science, Viale A. Doria 6, Catania, 95125, Italy.
Rosalba GiugnoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie 15, Verona, 37134, Italy. rosalba.giugno@univr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe analysis of tissue-specific protein interaction networks and their functional enrichment in pathological and normal tissues provides insights on the etiology of diseases. The Pan-cancer proteomic project, in The Cancer Genome Atlas, collects protein expressions in human cancers and it is a reference resource for the functional study of cancers. However, established protocols to infer interaction networks from protein expressions are still missing.

resultsWe have developed a methodology called Inference Network Based on iRefIndex Analysis (INBIA) to accurately correlate proteomic inferred relations to protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. INBIA makes use of 14 network inference methods on protein expressions related to 16 cancer types. It uses as reference model the iRefIndex human PPI network. Predictions are validated through non-interacting and tissue specific PPI networks resources. The first, Negatome, takes into account likely non-interacting proteins by combining both structure properties and literature mining. The latter, TissueNet and GIANT, report experimentally verified PPIs in more than 50 human tissues. The reliability of the proposed methodology is assessed by comparing INBIA with PERA, a tool which infers protein interaction networks from Pathway Commons, by both functional and topological analysis.

conclusionResults show that INBIA is a valuable approach to predict proteomic interactions in pathological conditions starting from the current knowledge of human protein interactions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansMutationNeoplasmsOrgan SpecificityProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsNetwork algorithmNetwork inferenceProtein expressionProtein interaction network

Identifiers

PMID30066650
PMCPMC6069689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.