Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066643›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

Identifying direct temporal relations between time and events from clinical notes.

Hee-Jin Lee, Yaoyun Zhang, Min Jiang, Jun Xu, Cui Tao, Hua Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Temporal disambiguation of relative temporal expressions in clinical texts.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Discrete Joint Model for Entity and Relation Extraction from Clinical Notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hee-Jin LeeSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Yaoyun ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Min JiangPieces Technologies, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jun XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Cui TaoSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. hua.xu@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Advancing Cancer Pharmacoepidemiology Research Through EHRs and InformaticsU24CA194215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI, YANG, PING · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Real-time Disambiguation of Abbreviations in Clinical NotesR01LM010681 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI XU, HUA · 2010 to 2017
$3.1M
Informatics Tools for Pharmacogenomic Discovery using Practice-based DataR01GM103859 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
Patient Medical History Representation, Extraction, and Inference from EHR DataR01LM011829 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194215NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103859NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010681NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost of the current work on clinical temporal relation identification follows the convention developed in the general domain, aiming to identify a comprehensive set of temporal relations from a document including both explicit and implicit relations. While such a comprehensive set can represent temporal information in a document in a complete manner, some of the temporal relations in the comprehensive set may not be essential depending on the clinical application of interest. Moreover, as the types of evidence that should be used to identify explicit and implicit relations are different, current clinical temporal relation identification systems that target both explicit and implicit relations still show low performances for practical use.

methodsIn this paper, we propose to focus on a sub-task of conventional temporal relation identification task in order to provide insight into building practical temporal relation identification modules for clinical text. We focus on identification of direct temporal relations, a subset of temporal relations that is chosen to minimize the amount of inference required to identify the relations. A corpus on direct temporal relations between time expressions and event mentions is constructed, and an automatic system tailored for direct temporal relations is developed.

resultsIt is shown that the direct temporal relations constitute a major category of temporal relations that contain important information needed for clinical applications. The system optimized for direct temporal relations achieves better performance than the state-of-the-art system developed with comprehensive set of both explicit and implicit relations in mind.

conclusionsWe expect direct temporal relations to facilitate the development of practical temporal information extraction tools in clinical domain.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDocumentationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical RecordsTime FactorsDirect temporal relationInformation extractionSyntactic structureTemporal relation identificationTLINK

Identifiers

PMID30066643
PMCPMC6069692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.