ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Deep learning models for bacteria taxonomic classification of metagenomic data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence techniques in bacteriology: a PRISMA-guided research agenda.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Decoding the microbiome: artificial intelligence-targeted gut microenvironment breakthroughs in personalized cancer therapy.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- LUADnet: a deep learning model for prediction of clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma based on gene expression signatures.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- DeepTaxa: a hybrid CNN-BERT framework for 16S rRNA taxonomic classification.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Exploiting fuzzy weights in CNN model-based taxonomic classification of 500-bp sequence bacterial dataset.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Life at the extremes: maximally divergent microbes with similar genomic signatures linked to extreme environments.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Review
- FGeneBERT: function-driven pre-trained gene language model for metagenomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A composite universal DNA signature for the tree of life.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- A curated benchmark dataset for molecular identification based on genome skimming.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota and their influence in brain cancer milieu.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Review
- FGeneBERT: function-driven pre-trained gene language model for metagenomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A review of neural networks for metagenomic binning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Rapid bacterial identification through volatile organic compound analysis and deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- DNASimCLR: a contrastive learning-based deep learning approach for gene sequence data classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Advancements in prokaryotic systematics and the role of Bergey's International Society for Microbial Systematicsin addressing challenges in the meta-data era.National science review · 2024Review
- Deep learning for predicting 16S rRNA gene copy number.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimized model architectures for deep learning on genomic data.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Deep learning methods in metagenomics: a review.Microbial genomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn open challenge in translational bioinformatics is the analysis of sequenced metagenomes from various environmental samples. Of course, several studies demonstrated the 16S ribosomal RNA could be considered as a barcode for bacteria classification at the genus level, but till now it is hard to identify the correct composition of metagenomic data from RNA-seq short-read data. 16S short-read data are generated using two next generation sequencing technologies, i.e. whole genome shotgun (WGS) and amplicon (AMP); typically, the former is filtered to obtain short-reads belonging to a 16S shotgun (SG), whereas the latter take into account only some specific 16S hypervariable regions. The above mentioned two sequencing technologies, SG and AMP, are used alternatively, for this reason in this work we propose a deep learning approach for taxonomic classification of metagenomic data, that can be employed for both of them.
resultsTo test the proposed pipeline, we simulated both SG and AMP short-reads, from 1000 16S full-length sequences. Then, we adopted a k-mer representation to map sequences as vectors into a numerical space. Finally, we trained two different deep learning architecture, i.e., convolutional neural network (CNN) and deep belief network (DBN), obtaining a trained model for each taxon. We tested our proposed methodology to find the best parameters configuration, and we compared our results against the classification performances provided by a reference classifier for bacteria identification, known as RDP classifier. We outperformed the RDP classifier at each taxonomic level with both architectures. For instance, at the genus level, both CNN and DBN reached 91.3% of accuracy with AMP short-reads, whereas RDP classifier obtained 83.8% with the same data.
conclusionsIn this work, we proposed a 16S short-read sequences classification technique based on k-mer representation and deep learning architecture, in which each taxon (from phylum to genus) generates a classification model. Experimental results confirm the proposed pipeline as a valid approach for classifying bacteria sequences; for this reason, our approach could be integrated into the most common tools for metagenomic analysis. According to obtained results, it can be successfully used for classifying both SG and AMP data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.