Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066629›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Deep learning models for bacteria taxonomic classification of metagenomic data.

Antonino Fiannaca, Laura La Paglia, Massimo La Rosa, Giosue' Lo Bosco, Giovanni Renda, Riccardo Rizzo, Salvatore Gaglio, Alfonso Urso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A review of neural networks for metagenomic binning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonino FiannacaCNR-ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, Palermo, Italy. antonino.fiannaca@icar.cnr.it.
Laura La PagliaCNR-ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo La RosaCNR-ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, Palermo, Italy.
Giosue' Lo BoscoDipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università degli studi di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 34, Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni RendaDipartimento dell'Innovazione Industriale e Digitale, Università degli studi di Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze, ed.6, Palermo, Italy.
Riccardo RizzoCNR-ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, Palermo, Italy.
Salvatore GaglioCNR-ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, Palermo, Italy.
Alfonso UrsoCNR-ICAR, National Research Council of Italy, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, Palermo, Italy.
National Research Council · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn open challenge in translational bioinformatics is the analysis of sequenced metagenomes from various environmental samples. Of course, several studies demonstrated the 16S ribosomal RNA could be considered as a barcode for bacteria classification at the genus level, but till now it is hard to identify the correct composition of metagenomic data from RNA-seq short-read data. 16S short-read data are generated using two next generation sequencing technologies, i.e. whole genome shotgun (WGS) and amplicon (AMP); typically, the former is filtered to obtain short-reads belonging to a 16S shotgun (SG), whereas the latter take into account only some specific 16S hypervariable regions. The above mentioned two sequencing technologies, SG and AMP, are used alternatively, for this reason in this work we propose a deep learning approach for taxonomic classification of metagenomic data, that can be employed for both of them.

resultsTo test the proposed pipeline, we simulated both SG and AMP short-reads, from 1000 16S full-length sequences. Then, we adopted a k-mer representation to map sequences as vectors into a numerical space. Finally, we trained two different deep learning architecture, i.e., convolutional neural network (CNN) and deep belief network (DBN), obtaining a trained model for each taxon. We tested our proposed methodology to find the best parameters configuration, and we compared our results against the classification performances provided by a reference classifier for bacteria identification, known as RDP classifier. We outperformed the RDP classifier at each taxonomic level with both architectures. For instance, at the genus level, both CNN and DBN reached 91.3% of accuracy with AMP short-reads, whereas RDP classifier obtained 83.8% with the same data.

conclusionsIn this work, we proposed a 16S short-read sequences classification technique based on k-mer representation and deep learning architecture, in which each taxon (from phylum to genus) generates a classification model. Experimental results confirm the proposed pipeline as a valid approach for classifying bacteria sequences; for this reason, our approach could be integrated into the most common tools for metagenomic analysis. According to obtained results, it can be successfully used for classifying both SG and AMP data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMetagenomeModels, GeneticAlgorithmsBacteriaDatabases, GeneticMetagenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16STime FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmpliconClassificationCNNDBNk-mer representationMetagenomicShotgun

Identifiers

PMID30066629
PMCPMC6069770
OpenAlexW2855293443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.