Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066245›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Phillip J Dijkhorst, Abel B Boerboom, Ignace M C Janssen, Dingeman J Swank, René M J Wiezer, Eric J Hazebroek, Frits J Berends, Edo O Aarts

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Early results of laparoscopic single‑anastomosis duodeno‑ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a case series from a single Polish bariatric center.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip J DijkhorstDutch Obesity Clinic, Huis ter Heide, Netherlands. phillip.dijkhorst@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-8559
Abel B BoerboomDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital/Vitalys Clinics, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Ignace M C JanssenDutch Obesity Clinic, Huis ter Heide, Netherlands.
Dingeman J SwankDepartment of Surgery, NOK-West/HMC and Groene Hart, The Hague and Gouda, Netherlands.
René M J WiezerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Eric J HazebroekDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital/Vitalys Clinics, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Frits J BerendsDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital/Vitalys Clinics, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Edo O AartsDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital/Vitalys Clinics, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Rijnstate Hospital · NLNederlandse Obesitas Kliniek · NLGroene Hart Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most performed bariatric procedure to induce weight loss worldwide. Unfortunately, a significant portion of patients show insufficient weight loss or weight regain after a few years.

objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of the single anastomosis duodenoileal (SADI) bypass versus the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on health outcomes in morbid obese patients who had undergone SG previously, with up to 2 years of follow-up.

methodsFrom 2007 to 2017, 140 patients received revisional laparoscopic surgery after SG in four specialized Dutch bariatric hospitals. Data was analyzed retrospectively and included comparisons for indication of surgery, vitamin/mineral deficiencies, and complications; divided into short-, medium-term. To compare weight loss, linear regression and linear mixed models were used.

resultsConversion of a SG to SADI was performed in 66 patients and to RYGB in 74 patients. For patients in which additional weight loss was the main indication for surgery, SADI achieved 8.7%, 12.4%, and 19.4% more total body weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to RYGB (all p < .001). When a RYGB was indicated in case of gastroesophageal reflux or dysphagia, it greatly reduced complaints almost directly after surgery. Furthermore, a similar amount of complications and nutritional deficiencies was observed for both groups. There was no intra- or post-operative mortality.

conclusionConversion into a SADI resulted in significantly more weight loss while complications rates and nutritional deficiencies were similar and may therefore be considered the recommended operation for patients in which only additional weight loss is required.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassHumansObesity, MorbidReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryGastric bypassMorbid obesityRYGB, duodenoileal bypassSADISGSleeve gastrectomyWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID30066245
PMCPMC6223754
OpenAlexW2885420142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.