Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066236›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2018

Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques : Examining Collective Representation in Emerging Technologies Governance.

Jacquelyne Luce

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jacquelyne LuceMount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadley, MA, 01075, USA. jluce@mtholyoke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-2790

Funding

Mount Holyoke College Internal Faculty Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, I draw on research carried out in Europe, primarily in Germany, on patients' and scientists' perspectives on mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs) in order to explore some of the complexities related to collective representation in health governance, which includes the translation of emerging technologies into clinical use. Focusing on observations, document analyses, and interviews with eight mitochondrial disease patient organization leaders, this contribution extends our understanding of the logic and meanings behind the ways in which patient participation and collective representation in health governance initiatives take shape. My findings highlight the ways in which a commitment to a global mitochondrial disease patient community and a sense of patient solidarity influence expressions of support with regard to legalizing mitochondrial replacement techniques. My analyses illustrate how normative practices and expectations of participatory governance potentially foreclose opportunities for sustained collective patient engagement with the complex ethical, social, and political dimensions of emerging technologies and may silence diverse and potentially dissenting embodied and lived responses to the prospects of particular technological developments.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyCommunity ParticipationMitochondrial Replacement TherapyOrganizationsPatient AdvocacySocial Control, FormalAttitudeDelivery of Health CareGovernmentHumansMitochondrial DiseasesPatient ParticipationResearch PersonnelAssisted reproductionEmerging medical technologiesGermanyMitochondrial diseaseMitochondrial replacement techniquesPatient organizations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.