Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066235›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2018

Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel.

Silke Schicktanz, Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty, Aviad Raz, Karin Jongsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Silke SchicktanzDepartment for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Goettingen, Germany. sschick@gwdg.de.
Nitzan Rimon-ZarfatyDepartment for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.
Aviad RazDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of The Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Karin JongsmaDepartment for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

State of Lower Saxony, Ministry for Science and Culture (DE) ZN3015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper analyses self-declared aims and representation of dementia patient organizations and advocacy groups (POs) in relation to two recent upheavals: the critique of social stigmatization and biomedical research focusing on prediction. Based on twenty-six semi-structured interviews conducted in 2016-2017 with members, service recipients, and board representatives of POs in Germany and Israel, a comparative analysis was conducted, based on a grounded theory approach, to detect emerging topics within and across the POs and across national contexts. We identified a heterogeneous landscape, with the only Israeli PO focusing strongly on caretakers, whereas in Germany several POs claim to represent this patient collective. Shared aims of all POs were fighting social stigma, balancing the loss of patients' individual autonomy, and the well-being of caretakers. By highlighting the emergence of new groups of dementia self-advocacy against the more traditional advocacy by others, this study highlights how advocacy and representation in the context of AD are embedded in the discursive context of stigmatization and revised disease conception. Future developments in early diagnosis and prediction of dementia, with more affected people likely to conduct dementia self-advocacy, might challenge existing representation structures even more.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCaregiversCommunity ParticipationOrganizationsPatient AdvocacyPersonal AutonomyBiomedical ResearchGermanyGrounded TheoryHumansIsraelPatient ParticipationSocial StigmaStereotypingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvocacyDementiaDisease conceptionPatient organizationRepresentationStigma

Identifiers

PMID30066235
PMCPMC6209015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.