Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30066177›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Metabolic targets of watercress and PEITC in MCF-7 and MCF-10A cells explain differential sensitisation responses to ionising radiation.

Natasa S Giallourou, Ian R Rowland, Steve D Rothwell, Graham Packham, Daniel M Commane, Jonathan R Swann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Watercress (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Narrative Review on Therapeutic Potentials ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natasa S GiallourouDepartment of Food and Nutritional Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Ian R RowlandDepartment of Food and Nutritional Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Steve D RothwellVitacress, Lower Link Farm, St Mary Bourne, Andover, Hampshire, UK.
Graham PackhamCancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Daniel M CommaneDepartment of Food and Nutritional Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Jonathan R SwannDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.swann@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-4529
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Reading · GBCancer Research UK · GBVitacress (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWatercress is a rich source of phytochemicals with anticancer potential, including phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC). We examined the potential for watercress extracts and PEITC to increase the DNA damage caused by ionising radiation (IR) in breast cancer cells and to be protective against radiation-induced collateral damage in healthy breast cells. The metabolic events that mediate such responses were explored using metabolic profiling.

methods

resultsBoth the watercress extract and PEITC-modulated biosynthetic pathways of lipid and protein synthesis and resulted in changes in cellular bioenergetics. Disruptions to the redox balance occurred with both treatments in the two cell lines, characterised by shifts in the abundance of glutathione. PEITC enhanced the sensitivity of the breast cancer cells to IR increasing the effectiveness of the cancer-killing process. In contrast, watercress-protected non-tumorigenic breast cells from radiation-induced damage. These effects were driven by changes in the cellular content of the antioxidant glutathione following exposure to PEITC and other phytochemicals in watercress.

conclusionThese findings support the potential prophylactic impact of watercress during radiotherapy. Extracted compounds from watercress and PEITC differentially modulate cellular metabolism collectively enhancing the therapeutic outcomes of radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAnticarcinogenic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorHumansIsothiocyanatesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMCF-7 CellsNasturtiumAnticarcinogenic AgentsIsothiocyanatesphenethyl isothiocyanateBreast cancerMetabolomicsPhenethyl isothiocyanateRadiotherapyWatercress

Identifiers

PMID30066177
PMCPMC6689287
OpenAlexW2887761336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.