ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018
Rating curve based assessment of seasonal variability of sulfate in streamflow.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though constituent concentrations and loads in rivers exhibit apparent seasonal fluctuations, they are characterized by event-driven nature of the fluctuations in respond to natural processes and seasonal anthropogenic activities. This study aimed at establishing relationship between streamflow and sulfate load in Gin River, the major water source in southern Sri Lanka and assessing seasonal sulfate levels in the streamflow following monsoon pattern and cultivation seasons. Rating curve, a load-streamflow regression model, was developed using adjusted maximum likelihood estimation. Following the assumptions of model fit, the regression model showed low correlation among explanatory variables and good empirical agreement with the measured data exhibiting its applicability to deduce sulfate loads from streamflow data, during non-sampling periods. Sulfate loads, highly dependent on streamflow, peaked annually in April-June (south-west monsoon contributing to Yala cultivation season) and October-December (north-east monsoon contributing to Maha cultivation season), following the bimodal monsoon pattern in the catchment. Median sulfate load exhibited fourfold increase from the lowest value 8,888 kg/day in August (non-cultivation season) to the highest value 38,185 kg/day in November (Maha cultivation season), despite the twofold increase of median streamflow between the two months. Flow-weighted sulfate concentrations showed varying flow dependence attributed to the seasonality. At low streamflows (above 70th percentile), sulfate concentration and streamflow were inversely related and at high streamflows (below 30th percentile), and sulfate concentration and streamflow were directly related. Elevated sulfate concentrations attributed to less soluble sulfate irons were clearly evident during the two cultivation seasons which coincided with the monsoon periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30066145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.