Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30065658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Metabolic Network-Based Identification and Prioritization of Anticancer Targets Based on Expression Data in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Gholamreza Bidkhori, Rui Benfeitas, Ezgi Elmas, Meisam Naeimi Kararoudi, Muhammad Arif, Mathias Uhlen, Jens Nielsen, Adil Mardinoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-scale model ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Journal of biosciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Metabolic rearrangements in primary liver cancers: cause and consequences.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gholamreza BidkhoriScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rui BenfeitasScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ezgi ElmasScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Meisam Naeimi KararoudiScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Muhammad ArifScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mathias UhlenScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jens NielsenDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Adil MardinogluScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly form of liver cancer with high mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, the large heterogeneity of this disease makes it difficult to develop effective treatment strategies. Cellular network analyses have been employed to study heterogeneity in cancer, and to identify potential therapeutic targets. However, the existing approaches do not consider metabolic growth requirements, i.e., biological network functionality, to rank candidate targets while preventing toxicity to non-cancerous tissues. Here, we developed an algorithm to overcome these issues based on integration of gene expression data, genome-scale metabolic models, network controllability, and dispensability, as well as toxicity analysis. This method thus predicts and ranks potential anticancer non-toxic controlling metabolite and gene targets. Our algorithm encompasses both objective-driven and-independent tasks, and uses network topology to finally rank the predicted therapeutic targets. We employed this algorithm to the analysis of transcriptomic data for 50 HCC patients with both cancerous and non-cancerous samples. We identified several potential targets that would prevent cell growth, including 74 anticancer metabolites, and 3 gene targets (PRKACA, PGS1, and CRLS1). The predicted anticancer metabolites showed good agreement with existing FDA-approved cancer drugs, and the 3 genes were experimentally validated by performing experiments in HepG2 and Hep3B liver cancer cell lines. Our observations indicate that our novel approach successfully identifies therapeutic targets for effective treatment of cancer. This approach may also be applied to any cancer type that has tumor and non-tumor gene or protein expression data.

Indexed as

biological networkscancergene expressiongenome-scale metabolic modelhepatocellular carcinomanetwork analysisprotein expressionsystems biology and network biology

Identifiers

PMID30065658
PMCPMC6056771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.