ArticleTropical medicine and health2018
Evaluation of nitrate reductase assay in 7H11 agar for diagnosis of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in eastern Nepal.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergence of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis is a serious challenge for successful global tuberculosis control. Early diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis by direct nitrate reductase assay (NRA) aids in appropriate treatment and reduction in disease transmission, particularly in countries with high tuberculosis burden. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of NRA for direct detection of resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid in
methodsFifty-eight new smear-positive sputum samples were processed as per the guidelines of revised national tuberculosis control program, India. The performance of NRA on middlebrook 7H11 agar was evaluated for detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance directly on smear-positive sputum specimens, and the results were compared with conventional proportion method. Sensitivity and specificity of the test were compared with the gold standard proportion method. Mc Nemar chi-square test was used to find out the significant difference between two methods.
resultsDirect NRA for detection of rifampicin resistance was 85.7% sensitive and 100% specific, whereas sensitivity and specificity of isoniazid resistance were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Agreement between NRA and proportion method was 98% for both the drugs. The mean days of drug susceptibility testing results were 19.3 days for NRA and 72 days for conventional proportion method. The results of NRA were available in 21 days for 83% of the samples.
conclusionsDirect NRA on middlebrook 7H11 medium is a highly sensitive, reliable, and significantly faster method to perform drug susceptibility testing. It has the potential to be implemented for rapid detection of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis against insufficient resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.