Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30065357›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2018

Landmarks in prostate cancer.

Niranjan J Sathianathen, Badrinath R Konety, Juanita Crook, Fred Saad, Nathan Lawrentschuk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Immunohistochemical markers as predictors of prognosis in multifocal prostate cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niranjan J SathianathenDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. niranjan19@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-014X
Badrinath R KonetyDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Juanita CrookDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Radiotherapeutics, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Fred SaadDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Nathan LawrentschukUniversity of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of prostate cancer has been the subject of extensive research that has resulted in important discoveries and shaped our appreciation of this disease and its management. Advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, natural history, anatomy, detection, diagnosis, grading, staging, imaging, and management of prostate cancer have changed clinical practice and influenced guideline recommendations. The development of the Gleason score and subsequent modifications enabled accurate prediction of prognosis. Increased anatomical understanding and improved surgical techniques resulted in the development of nerve-sparing surgery for radical prostatectomy. The advent of active surveillance has changed the management of low-risk disease, and chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have improved the outcomes of patients with distant disease. Ongoing research and clinical trials are expected to yield more practice-changing results in the near future.

Indexed as

HumansMaleProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.