ArticleScientific reports2018
Investigation of recombination-intense viral groups and their genes in the Earth's virome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small viruses reveal bidirectional evolution between HK97-fold viruses and encapsulins via procapsids.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Rapid adaptation accelerates competitive suppression in a parasite community.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Microbial community dynamics in blood, faeces and oral secretions of neotropical bats in Casanare, Colombia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hidden diversity of double-stranded DNA phages in symbioticPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Interactions between bacterial and phage communities in natural environments.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022Review
- Long-read metagenomics using PromethION uncovers oral bacteriophages and their interaction with host bacteria.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Analysis of genetic recombination and the pan-genome of a highly recombinogenic bacteriophage species.Microbial genomics · 2019Article
- Review
- IMG/VR v.2.0: an integrated data management and analysis system for cultivated and environmental viral genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophages (phages), or bacterial viruses, are the most abundant and diverse biological entities that impact the global ecosystem. Recent advances in metagenomics have revealed their rampant abundance in the biosphere. A fundamental aspect of bacteriophages that remains unexplored in metagenomic data is the process of recombination as a driving force in evolution that occurs among different viruses within the same bacterial host. Here, we systematically examined signatures of recombination in every gene from 211 species-level viral groups in a recently obtained dataset of the Earth's virome that contain corresponding information on the host bacterial species. Our study revealed that signatures of recombination are widespread (84%) among the diverse viral groups. We identified 25 recombination-intense viral groups, widely distributed across the viral taxonomy, and present in bacterial species living in the human oral cavity. We also revealed a significant inverse association between the recombination-intense viral groups and Type II restriction endonucleases, that could be effective in reducing recombination among phages in a cell. Furthermore, we identified recombination-intense genes that are significantly enriched for encoding phage morphogenesis proteins. Changes in the viral genomic sequence by recombination may be important to escape cleavage by the host bacterial immune systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.