Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30065211›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Cognitive Impairment and Celiac Disease: Is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation a

Giuseppe Lanza, Rita Bella, Mariagiovanna Cantone, Giovanni Pennisi, Raffaele Ferri, Manuela Pennisi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Editorial: Nutrients and brain: from bench to the bedside.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe LanzaOasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Via Conte Ruggero, 73-94018 Troina, Italy. glanza@oasi.en.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5659-662X
Rita BellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78-95123 Catania, Italy. rbella@unict.it.
Mariagiovanna CantoneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. mariagiovanna.cantone@irccsme.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-4971
Giovanni PennisiDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgery Specialties, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78-95123 Catania, Italy. pennigi@unict.it.
Raffaele FerriOasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Via Conte Ruggero, 73-94018 Troina, Italy. rferri@oasi.en.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6937-3065
Manuela PennisiSpinal Unit, Emergency Hospital Cannizzaro, Via Messina, 829-95126 Catania, Italy. manuelapennisi78@gmail.com.
Oasi Maria SS · ITUniversity of Catania · ITCentro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease is a systemic disorder with multifactorial pathogenesis and multifaceted symptomatology. In response to gluten exposure, a significant part of the general population produces antibodies that have been hypothesized to be deleterious to the brain. Among the well-known neurological manifestations, adult celiac patients often complain cognitive symptoms, ranging from the so-called "brain fog" till an overt dementia. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can contribute to the assessment and monitoring of celiac patients, even in those without a clear neurological involvement. The studies here reviewed seem to converge on an impaired central motor conductivity and a "hyperexcitable celiac brain" to TMS, which partially reverts back after a long-term gluten restriction. Notably, a clear hyperexcitability is a stably reported feature of both degenerative and vascular dementia. Therefore, given its potential neuroprotective effect, the gluten-free diet should be introduced as early as possible, although the overall response of neurological symptoms (and cognition in particular) is still controversial. Identifying new and possibly modifiable risk factors may be of crucial importance for patients, clinicians, and researchers.

Indexed as

AnimalsCeliac DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationceliac diseasecortical excitabilitygut-brain axismotor evoked potentialsneuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID30065211
PMCPMC6121508
OpenAlexW2885084838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.