Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30065071›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2018

Parkinson's disease: convergence on synaptic homeostasis.

Sandra-Fausia Soukup, Roeland Vanhauwaert, Patrik Verstreken

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Parkinson's Disease-Associated Remodeling of SynapticJournal of proteome research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Brain communications · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra-Fausia SoukupVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain& Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium sandra.soukup@kuleuven.vib.be patrik.verstreken@kuleuven.vib.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2915-919X
Roeland VanhauwaertVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain& Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrik VerstrekenVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain& Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium sandra.soukup@kuleuven.vib.be patrik.verstreken@kuleuven.vib.be.ORCID 0000-0002-5073-5393
VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease, the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, affects millions of people globally. There is no cure, and its prevalence will double by 2030. In recent years, numerous causative genes and risk factors for Parkinson's disease have been identified and more than half appear to function at the synapse. Subtle synaptic defects are thought to precede blunt neuronal death, but the mechanisms that are dysfunctional at synapses are only now being unraveled. Here, we review recent work and propose a model where different Parkinson proteins interact in a cell compartment-specific manner at the synapse where these proteins regulate endocytosis and autophagy. While this field is only recently emerging, the work suggests that the loss of synaptic homeostasis may contribute to neurodegeneration and is a key player in Parkinson's disease.

Indexed as

AutophagyEndocytosisHomeostasisHumansParkinson DiseaseSynapsesautophagycommon factors in Parkinson's diseaseendocytosisprotein homeostasissynaptic decay

Identifiers

PMID30065071
PMCPMC6138432
OpenAlexW2885280818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.