Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064968›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2018

Developing a Digital Marketplace for Family Planning: Pilot Randomized Encouragement Trial.

Eric P Green, Arun Augustine, Violet Naanyu, Anna-Karin Hess, Lulla Kiwinda

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03224390 (A Pilot Study to Estimate the Impact of a Screening and Referral Service on Contraceptive Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03224390 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study to Estimate the Impact of a Screening and Referral Service on Contraceptive Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled112ConditionsContraception BehaviorArmsdigital family planning screening and referral service
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric P GreenDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2188-2244
Arun AugustineDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-0828
Violet NaanyuDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-1719
Anna-Karin HessDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-7695
Lulla KiwindaDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-3088
Duke University · USMoi University · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily planning is an effective tool for preventing death among women who do not want to become pregnant and has been shown to improve newborn health outcomes, advance women's empowerment, and bring socioeconomic benefits through reductions in fertility and population growth. Yet among the populations that would benefit the most from family planning, uptake remains too low. The emergence of digital health tools has created new opportunities to strengthen health systems and promote behavior change. In this study, women with an unmet need for family planning in Western Kenya were randomized to receive an encouragement to try an automated investigational digital health intervention that promoted the uptake of family planning.

objectiveThe objectives of the pilot study were to explore the feasibility of a full-scale trial-in particular, the recruitment, encouragement, and follow-up data collection procedures-and to examine the preliminary effect of the intervention on contraception uptake.

methodsThis pilot study tested the procedures for a randomized encouragement trial. We recruited 112 women with an unmet need for family planning from local markets in Western Kenya, conducted an eligibility screening, and randomized half of the women to receive an encouragement to try the investigational intervention. Four months after encouraging the treatment group, we conducted a follow-up survey with enrolled participants via short message service (SMS) text message.

resultsThe encouragement sent via SMS text messages to the treatment group led to differential rates of intervention uptake between the treatment and control groups; however, uptake by the treatment group was lower than anticipated (19/56, 33.9% vs 1/56, 1.8%, in the control group). Study attrition was also substantial. We obtained follow-up data from 44.6% (50/112) of enrolled participants. Among those in the treatment group who tried the intervention, the instrumental variables estimate of the local average treatment effect was an increase in the probability of contraceptive uptake of 41.0 percentage points (95% uncertainty interval -0.03 to 0.85).

conclusionsThis randomized encouragement design and study protocol is feasible but requires modifications to the recruitment, encouragement, and follow-up data collection procedures.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03224390; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03224390 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70yitdJu8).

Indexed as

AdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansInternetPilot ProjectsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineYoung Adultcontraceptiondigital healthfamily planningKenyaunmet need

Identifiers

PMID30064968
PMCPMC6092593
OpenAlexW2808133480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.