Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064959›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2018

Using Health IT to Coordinate Care and Improve Quality in Safety-Net Clinics.

Ashley M Kranz, Sarah Dalton, Cheryl Damberg, Justin W Timbie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Client-Centered Care Coordination (C4Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley M KranzRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic address: akranz@rand.org.
Sarah DaltonRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Cheryl DambergRAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
Justin W TimbieRAND Corporation, Arlington.

Funding

Understanding Health Care Delivery Systems PCOR Adoption and System PerformanceU19HS024067 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI DAMBERG, CHERYL · 2015 to 2019
$17.4M
AHRQ HHS U19 HS024067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth centers provide care to vulnerable and high-need populations. Recent investments have promoted use of health information technology (HIT) capabilities for improving care coordination and quality of care in health centers. This study examined factors associated with use of these HIT capabilities and the association between these capabilities and quality of care in a census of health centers in the United States.

methodsCross-sectional secondary data from the 2015 Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System was used to examine 6 measures of HIT capability related to care coordination and clinical decision support and 16 measures of quality (12 process measures, 3 outcome measures, 1 composite measure) for health centers in the United States. Adjusted logistic regressions were used to examine health center characteristics associated with use of HIT capabilities, and adjusted linear regressions were used to examine associations between HIT capabilities and quality of care.

resultsMany health centers reported using HIT for care coordination activities, including coordinating enabling services (67.3%) or engaging patients (81.0%). Health center size and medical home recognition were associated with significantly greater odds of using HIT for enabling services and engaging patients. These HIT capabilities were associated with higher overall quality and higher rates of six process measures (adult screening and maternal and child health) and hemoglobin A1c control.

conclusionUse of HIT for such activities as arranging enabling services and engaging patients are underleveraged tools for care coordination. There may be opportunities to further improve quality of care for vulnerable patients by promoting health centers' use of these HIT capabilities.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHealth Information SystemsHumansPatient Care ManagementPatient-Centered CareQuality ImprovementResidence CharacteristicsSafety-net ProvidersSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30064959
PMCPMC6996474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.