Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064709›Full record

ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2020

Herd level estimation of probability of disease freedom applied on the Norwegian control program for bovine respiratory syncytial virus and bovine coronavirus.

Ingrid Toftaker, Estelle Ågren, Maria Stokstad, Ane Nødtvedt, Jenny Frössling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ingrid ToftakerDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: ingrid.toftaker@nmbu.no.
Estelle ÅgrenDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria StokstadDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, Oslo, Norway.
Ane NødtvedtDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, Oslo, Norway.
Jenny FrösslingDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A national control program against bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) and bovine coronavirus (BCV) was launched in Norway in 2016. A key strategy in the program is to test for presence of antibodies and protect test-negative herds from infection. Because these viruses are endemic, the rate of re-introduction can be high, and a disease-free status will become more uncertain as time from testing elapses. The aim of this study was to estimate the probability of freedom (PostPFree) from BRSV and BCV antibodies over time by use of bulk tank milk (BTM) antibody-testing, geographic information and animal movement data, and to validate the herd-level estimates against subsequent BTM testing. BTM samples were collected from 1148 study herds in West Norway in 2013 and 2016, and these were analyzed for BRSV and BCV antibodies. PostPFree was calculated for herds that were negative in 2013/2014, and updated periodically with new probabilities every three months. Input variables were test sensitivity, the probability of introduction through animal purchase and local transmission. Probability of introduction through animal purchase was calculated by using real animal movement data and herd prevalence in the region of the source herd. The PostPFree from the final three months in 2015 was compared to BTM test results from March 2016 using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. The probability of freedom was generally high for test-negative herds immediately after testing, reflecting the high sensitivity of the tests. It did however, decrease with time since testing, and was greatly affected by purchase of livestock. When comparing the median PostPFree for the final three months to the test results in 2016, it was significantly lower (p < 0.01) for test positive herds. Furthermore, there was a large difference in the proportion of test positive herds between the first and fourth quartile of PostPFree. The results show that PostPFree provides a better estimate of herd-level BTM status for both BRSV and BCV than what can be achieved by relying solely on the previous test-result.

Indexed as

Coronavirus, BovineRespiratory Syncytial Virus, BovineAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCattleCattle DiseasesCoronavirus InfectionsFemaleInfection ControlMilkNorwayProbabilityRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsAntibodies, ViralAnimal movementsBCoVBCVBovine respiratory diseaseBRDBRSVBulk tank milkCattleDisease control

Identifiers

PMID30064709
PMCPMC7114343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.