ArticleParasites & vectors2018
Efficacy and persistence of long-lasting microbial larvicides against malaria vectors in western Kenya highlands.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Less is more: modelling the impact of species-targeted versus broadcast larviciding in Anopheles funestus-dominated malaria transmission settings.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Lysinibacillus sphaericus exposure impedes Anopheles dirus's oviposition via downregulating vitellogenin.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a long-lasting microbial larvicide against Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti under laboratory and a semi-field trial.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Seasonal Dynamics of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax Infections in Coendemic Low-Transmission Settings, South Ethiopia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Addressing challenges in vector control: a review of current strategies and the imperative for novel tools in India's combat against vector-borne diseases.BMJ public health · 2024Review
- Combined use of long-lasting insecticidal nets and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis larviciding, a promising integrated approach against malaria transmission in northern Côte d'Ivoire.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Effect of predators on Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus larval survivorship in Homa Bay County Western Kenya.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- A Culex quinquefasciatus strain resistant to the binary toxin from Lysinibacillus sphaericus displays altered enzyme activities and energy reserves.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Laboratory-based efficacy evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis and temephos larvicides against larvae of Anopheles stephensi in ethiopia.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- The Laboratory and Semi-Field Larvicidal Effects of Essential Oil Extracted fromJournal of parasitology research · 2023Article
- Enhancing Malaria Research, Surveillance, and Control in Endemic Areas of Kenya and Ethiopia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- A Yeast RNA-Interference Pesticide Targeting theInsects · 2021Article
- A Broad-Based Mosquito Yeast Interfering RNA Pesticide TargetingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Mosquito Control Priorities in Florida-Survey Results from Florida Mosquito Control Districts.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review
- Evaluation of different deployment strategies for larviciding to control malaria: a simulation study.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- Long-lasting microbial larvicides for controlling insecticide resistant and outdoor transmitting vectors: a cost-effective supplement for malaria interventions.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020Article
- The need for new vector control approaches targeting outdoor biting Anopheline malaria vector communities.Parasites & vectors · 2020Review
- Bacterial larvicides used for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa: review of their effectiveness and operational feasibility.Parasites & vectors · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChemical-based malaria vector control interventions are threatened by the development of insecticide resistance and changes in the behavior of the vectors, and thus require the development of alternative control methods. Bacterial-based larvicides have the potential to target both insecticide resistant and outdoor-biting mosquitoes and are safe to use in the environment. However, the currently available microbial larvicide formulations have a short duration of activity requiring frequent re-applications which increase the cost of control interventions. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and duration of activity of two long-lasting formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) and Bacillus sphaericus (Bs) (LL3 and FourStar®) under field conditions in western Kenya highlands.
methodsThree sites were selected for this study in the highlands of western Kenya. In each site, one hundred anopheline larval habitats were selected and assigned to one of three arms: (i) LL3; (ii) FourStar®; and (iii) untreated control larval habitats. Four types of larval habitats were surveyed: abandoned gold mines, drainage canals, fish ponds and non-fish ponds. The habitats were sampled for mosquito larvae by using a standard dipping technique and collected larvae were recorded according to the larval stages of the different Anopheles species. The larvicides were applied at manufacturers' recommended dosage of 1 briquette per 100 square feet. Both treatment and control habitats were sampled for mosquito larvae immediately before treatment (day 0), and then at 24 hours, 3 days and weekly post-treatment for 5 months.
resultsOverall larval density in treatment habitats was significantly reduced after application of the two microbial larvicides as compared to the control habitats. Post-intervention reduction in anopheline larval density by LL3 was 65, 71 and 84% for 1 day, 2 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively. FourStar® reduced anopheline larval density by 60, 66 and 80% for 1 day, 2 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively. Comparisons between the treatments reveal that LL3 and FourStar® were similar in efficacy. A higher reduction in Anopheles larval density was observed in the abandoned goldmines, while drainage canals had the lowest reduction.
conclusionsBoth LL3 and FourStar® long-lasting microbial larvicides were effective in reducing immature stages of An. gambiae complex and An. funestus group species, with significant reductions lasting for three months post-application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.